From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Urs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>,
Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de>,
Urs Thuermann <urs.thuermann@volkswagen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] CAN: Add documentation
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:30:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070917103003.109ae665.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070917100441.18347.7@janus.isnogud.escape.de>
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:03:28 +0200 Urs Thuermann wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for all of this informative documentation.
I have some typo/spello corrections below.
> This patch adds documentation for the PF_CAN protocol family.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de>
> Signed-off-by: Urs Thuermann <urs.thuermann@volkswagen.de>
>
> ---
> Documentation/networking/00-INDEX | 2
> Documentation/networking/can.txt | 635 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 637 insertions(+)
>
> Index: net-2.6.24/Documentation/networking/can.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ net-2.6.24/Documentation/networking/can.txt 2007-09-17 10:27:25.000000000 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,635 @@
> +============================================================================
> +
> +1. Overview / What is Socket CAN
> +--------------------------------
> +
> +The socketcan package is an implementation of CAN protocols
> +(Controller Area Network) for Linux. CAN is a networking technology
> +which has wide-spread use in automation, embedded devices, and
widespread
> +automotive fields. While there have been other CAN implementations
> +for Linux based on character devices, Socket CAN uses the Berkeley
> +socket API, the Linux network stack and implements the CAN device
> +drivers as network interfaces. The CAN socket API has been designed
> +as similar as possible to the TCP/IP protocols to allow programmers,
> +familiar with network programming, to easily learn how to use CAN
> +sockets.
> +
> +2. Motivation / Why using the socket API
> +----------------------------------------
> +
> +Socket CAN was designed to overcome all of these limitations. A new
> +protocol family has been implemented which provides a socket interface
> +to user space applications and which builds upon the Linux network
> +layer, so to use all of the provided queueing functionality. Device
> +drivers for CAN controller hardware register itself with the Linux
A device driver ... registers itself
> +network layer as a network device, so that CAN frames from the
> +controller can be passed up to the network layer and on to the CAN
> +protocol family module and also vice-versa. Also, the protocol family
> +module provides an API for transport protocol modules to register, so
> +that any number of transport protocols can be loaded or unloaded
> +dynamically. In fact, the can core module alone does not provide any
> +protocol and can not be used without loading at least one additional
cannot
> +protocol module. Multiple sockets can be opened at the same time,
> +on different or the same protocol module and they can listen/send
> +frames on different or the same CAN IDs. Several sockets listening on
> +the same interface for frames with the same CAN ID are all passed the
> +same received matching CAN frames. An application wishing to
> +communicate using a specific transport protocol, e.g. ISO-TP, just
> +selects that protocol when opening the socket, and then can read and
> +write application data byte streams, without having to deal with
> +CAN-IDs, frames, etc.
> +
> +Similar functionality visible from user-space could be provided by a
> +character decive, too, but this would lead to a technically inelegant
> +solution for a couple of reasons:
> +
> +* Intricate usage. Instead of passing a protocol argument to
> + socket(2) and using bind(2) to select a CAN interface and CAN ID, an
> + application would have to do all these operations using ioctl(2)s.
> +
> +* Code duplication. A character device cannot make use of the Linux
> + network queueing code, so all that code would have to be duplicated
> + for CAN networking.
> +
> +* Abstraction. In most existing character-device implementations, the
> + hardware-specific device driver for a CAN controller directly
> + provides the character device for the application to work with.
> + This is at least very unusual in Unix systems, for both, char and
^drop comma
> + block devices. For example you don't have a character device for a
> + certain UART of a serial interface, a certain sound chip in your
> + computer, a SCSI or IDE controller providing access to your hard
> + disk or tape streamer device. Instead, you have abstraction layers
> + which provide a unified character or block device interface to the
> + application on the one hand, and a interface for hardware-specific
> + device drivers on the other hand. These abstractions are provided
> + by subsystems like the tty layer, the audio subsystem or the SCSI
> + and IDE subsystems for the devices mentioned above.
> +
> + The easiest way to implement a CAN device driver is as a character
> + without such a (complete) abstraction layer, as is done by most
> + existing drivers. The right way, however, would be to add such a
> + layer with all the functionality like registering for certain CAN
> + IDs, supporting several open file descriptors and (de)multplexing
(de)multiplexing
> + CAN frames between them, (sophisticated) queueing of CAN frames, and
> + providing an API for device driver to register with. However, then
drivers
> + it would be no more difficult, or may be even easier, to use the
> + networking framework provided by the Linux kernel, and this is what
> + Socket CAN does.
> +
> + The use of the networking framework of the Linux kernel is just the
> + natural and most appropriate way to implement CAN for Linux.
> +
> +3. Socket CAN concept
> +---------------------
> +
> + As described in chapter 2 it is the main goal of Socket CAN to
> + provide a socket interface to user space applications which builds
> + upon the Linux networklayer. In opposite to the commonly known
network layer. In constrast to
> + TCP/IP and ethernet networking the CAN bus is a broadcast-only(!)
^insert comma
> + medium that has no MAC-layer adressing like ethernet. The CAN-identifier
addressing
> + (can_id) is used for arbitration on the CAN-bus. Therefore the CAN-IDs
> + have to be choosen unique on the bus. When designing a CAN-ECU
chosen uniquely
> + network the CAN-IDs are mapped to be sent by a specific ECU.
> + For this reason a CAN-ID can be treatened best as a kind of source address.
treated
> +
> + 3.1 receive lists
> +
> + The network transparent access of multiple applications leads to the
> + problem that different applications may be interrested in the same
interested
> + CAN-IDs from the same CAN network interface. The Socket CAN core
> + module - which implements the protocol family CAN - provides several
> + high efficient receive lists for this reason. If e.g. a user space
> + application opens a CAN RAW socket, the raw protocol module itself
> + requests the (range of) CAN-IDs from the Socket CAN core that are
> + requested by the user. The subscription and unsubscription of
> + CAN-IDs can be done for specific CAN interfaces or for all(!) known
> + CAN interfaces with the can_rx_(un)register() functions provided to
> + CAN protocol modules by the SocketCAN core (see chapter 5).
> + To optimize the CPU usage at runtime the receive lists are split up
> + into several specific lists per device that match the requested
> + filter complexity for a given use-case.
> +
> + 3.2 loopback
> +
> + As known from other networking concepts the data exchanging
> + applications may run on the same or different nodes without any
> + change (except if the according addressing information):
except for
> +
> + ___ ___ ___ _______ ___
> + | _ | | _ | | _ | | _ _ | | _ |
> + ||A|| ||B|| ||C|| ||A| |B|| ||C||
> + |___| |___| |___| |_______| |___|
> + | | | | |
> + -----------------(1)- CAN bus -(2)---------------
> +
> + To ensure that application A receives the same information in the
> + expample (2) as it would receive in example (1) there is need for
example
> + some kind of local loopback on the appropriate node.
> +
> + The Linux network devices (by default) just can handle the
> + transmission and receiption of media dependend frames. Due to the
reception of media dependent
> + arbritration on the CAN bus the transmission of a low prio CAN-ID
> + may be delayed from the receipition of a high prio CAN frame. To
by reception
> + reflect the correct* traffic on the node the loopback of the sent
> + data has to be performed right after a successful transmission. If
> + the CAN network interface is not capable to perform the loopback for
of performing
> + some reason the SocketCAN core can do this task as a fallback solution.
> + See chapter 6.2 for details (recommended).
> +
> + The loopback functionality is enabled by default to reflect standard
> + networking behaviour for CAN applications. Due to some requests from
> + the RT-SocketCAN group the loopback optionally may be disabled for each
> + seperate socket. See sockopts from the CAN RAW sockets in chapter 4.1 .
separate 4.1.
> +
> + * = you really like to have this when you're running analyser tools
> + like 'candump' or 'cansniffer' on the (same) node.
> +
> + 3.3 network security issues (capabilities)
> +
> + The Controller Area Network is a local field bus transmitting only
> + broadcast messages without any routing and security concepts.
> + In the majority of cases the user application has to deal with
> + raw CAN frames. Therefore it might be reasonable NOT to restrict
> + the CAN access only to the user root, as known from other networks.
> + Since the currently implemented CAN_RAW and CAN_BCM sockets can only
> + send and receive frames to/from CAN interfaces it does not affect
> + security of others networks to allow all users to access the CAN.
> + To enable non-root users to access CAN_RAW and CAN_BCM protocol
> + sockets the Kconfig options CAN_RAW_USER and/or CAN_BCM_USER may be
> + selected at kernel compile time.
> +
> + 3.4 network problem notifications
> +
> + The use of the CAN bus may lead to several problems on the physical
> + and media access control layer. Detecting and logging of these lower
> + layer problems is a vital requirement for CAN users to identify
> + hardware issues on the physical transceiver layer as well as
> + arbitration problems and error frames caused by the different
> + ECUs. The occurance of detected errors are important for diagnosis
occurrence
> + and have to be logged together with the exact timestamp. For this
> + reason the CAN interface driver can generate so called Error Frames
> + that can optionally be passed to the user application on the same
in
> + way like other CAN frames. Whenever an error on the physical layer
as
> + or the MAC layer is detected (e.g. by the CAN controller) the driver
> + creates an appropriate error frame. Error frames can be requested by
> + the user application using the common CAN filter mechanisms. Inside
> + this filter definition the (interrested) type of errors may be
(interested)
> + selected. The receiption of error frames is disabled by default.
reception
> +
> +4. How to use Socket CAN
> +------------------------
> +
> + Like TCP/IP, you first need to open a socket for communicating over a
> + CAN network. Since Socket CAN implements a new protocol family, you
> + need to pass PF_CAN as the first argument to the socket(2) system
> + call. Currently, there are two CAN protocols to choose from, the raw
> + socket protocol and the broadcast manager (BCM). So to open a socket,
> + you would write
> +
> + s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_RAW, CAN_RAW);
> +
> + and
> +
> + s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_DGRAM, CAN_BCM);
> +
> + respectively. After the successful creation of the socket, you would
> + normally use the bind(2) system call to bind the socket to a CAN
> + interface (which is different to TCP/IP due to different addressing
from
> + - see chapter 3). After binding (CAN_RAW) or connecting (CAN_BCM)
> + the socket, you can read(2) and write(2) from/to the socket or use
> + send(2), sendto(2), sendmsg(2) and the recv* counterpart operations
> + on the socket as usual. There are also CAN specific socket options
> + described below.
> +
> + The basic CAN frame structure and the sockaddr structure are defined
> + in include/linux/can.h:
> +
> + struct can_frame {
> + canid_t can_id; /* 32 bit CAN_ID + EFF/RTR/ERR flags */
> + __u8 can_dlc; /* data length code: 0 .. 8 */
> + __u8 data[8] __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> + };
> +
> + The alignment of the (linear) payload data[] to a 64bit boundary
> + allows the user to define own structs and unions to easily access the
> + CAN payload. There is no given byteorder on the CAN bus by
> + default. A read(2) system call on a CAN_RAW socket transfers a
> + struct can_frame to the user space.
> +
> + The sockaddr_can structure has an interface index analogue to the
> + PF_PACKET socket, that also binds to a specific interface:
> +
> + struct sockaddr_can {
> + sa_family_t can_family;
> + int can_ifindex;
> + union {
> + struct { canid_t rx_id, tx_id; } tp16;
> + struct { canid_t rx_id, tx_id; } tp20;
> + struct { canid_t rx_id, tx_id; } mcnet;
> + struct { canid_t rx_id, tx_id; } isotp;
> + struct { int lcu, type; } bap;
> + } can_addr;
> + };
> +
> + To determine the interface index the an appropriate ioctl() has to
^ drop "the"
> + be used (example for CAN_RAW sockets without error checking):
> +
> + int s;
> + struct sockaddr_can addr;
> + struct ifreq ifr;
> +
> + s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_RAW, CAN_RAW);
> +
> + strcpy(ifr.ifr_name, "can0" );
> + ioctl(s, SIOCGIFINDEX, &ifr);
> +
> + addr.can_family = AF_CAN;
> + addr.can_ifindex = ifr.ifr_ifindex;
> +
> + bind(s, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
> +
> + (..)
> +
> + To bind a socket to all(!) CAN interfaces the interface index might
Why "might be"? How about "would be" or "shall be" or "must be"
or simply "is"?
> + be 0 (zero). In this case the socket receives CAN frames from every
> + enabled CAN interface. To determine the originating CAN interface
> + the system call recvfrom(2) may be used instead of read(2). To send
> + on a socket that is bound to 'any' interface sendto(2) is needed to
> + specify the outgoing interface.
> +
> + Reading CAN frames from a bound CAN_RAW socket (see above) consists
> + of reading a struct can_frame:
> +
> + struct can_frame frame;
> +
> + nbytes = read(s, &frame, sizeof(struct can_frame));
> +
> + if (nbytes < 0) {
> + perror("can raw socket read");
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + /* paraniod check ... */
> + if (nbytes < sizeof(struct can_frame)) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "read: incomplete CAN frame\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + /* do something with the received CAN frame */
> +
> + Writing CAN frames can be done analogue with the write(2) system call:
similarly,
or
analogously,
> +
> + nbytes = write(s, &frame, sizeof(struct can_frame));
> +
> + When the CAN interface is bound to 'any' existing CAN interface
> + (addr.can_ifindex = 0) it is recommended to use recvfrom(2) if the
> + information about the originating CAN interface is needed:
> +
> + struct sockaddr_can addr;
> + struct ifreq ifr;
> + socklen_t len = sizeof(addr);
> + struct can_frame frame;
> +
> + nbytes = recvfrom(s, &frame, sizeof(struct can_frame),
> + 0, (struct sockaddr*)&addr, &len);
> +
> + /* get interface name of the received CAN frame */
> + ifr.ifr_ifindex = addr.can_ifindex;
> + ioctl(s, SIOCGIFNAME, &ifr);
> + printf("Received a CAN frame from interface %s", ifr.ifr_name);
> +
> + To write CAN frames on sockets bound to 'any' CAN interface the
> + outgoing interface has to be defined certainly.
> +
> + strcpy(ifr.ifr_name, "can0");
> + ioctl(s, SIOCGIFINDEX, &ifr);
> + addr.can_ifindex = ifr.ifr_ifindex;
> + addr.can_family = AF_CAN;
> +
> + nbytes = sendto(s, &frame, sizeof(struct can_frame),
> + 0, (struct sockaddr*)&addr, sizeof(addr));
> +
> + 4.1 RAW protocol sockets with can_filters (SOCK_RAW)
> +
> + Using CAN_RAW sockets is extensively comparable to the commonly
> + known access to CAN character devices. To meet the new possibilities
> + provided by the multi user SocketCAN approach, some reasonable
> + defaults are set at RAW socket bindung time:
binding
> +
> + - The filters are set to exactly one filter receiving everything
> + - The socket only receives valid data frames (=> no error frames)
> + - The loopback of sent CAN frames is enabled (see chapter 3.2)
> + - The socket does not receive it's own sent frames (in loopback mode)
its
> +
> + These default settings may be changed before or after binding the socket.
> + To use the referenced definitions of the socket options for CAN_RAW
> + sockets include linux/can/raw.h .
sockets, include <linux/can/raw.h>.
> +
> + 4.1.1 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_FILTER
> +
> + The receiption of CAN frames using CAN_RAW sockets can be controlled
reception
> + by defining 0 .. n filters with the CAN_RAW_FILTER socket option.
> +
> + The CAN filter structure is defined in include/linux/can.h:
> +
> + struct can_filter {
> + canid_t can_id;
> + canid_t can_mask;
> + };
> +
> + A filter matches, when
> +
> + <received_can_id> & mask == can_id & mask
> +
> + which is analogue to known CAN controllers hardware filter semantics.
similar to
or
analagous to
> + The filter can be inverted in this semantic, when the CAN_INV_FILTER
> + bit is set in can_id element of the can_filter structure. In
> + opposite to CAN controller hardware filters the user may set 0 .. n
contrast
> + receive filters for each open socket separately:
> +
> + struct can_filter rfilter[2];
> +
> + rfilter[0].can_id = 0x123;
> + rfilter[0].can_mask = CAN_SFF_MASK;
> + rfilter[1].can_id = 0x200;
> + rfilter[1].can_mask = 0x700;
> +
> + setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_FILTER, &rfilter, sizeof(rfilter));
> +
> + To disable the receiption of CAN frames on the selected CAN_RAW socket:
reception
> +
> + setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_FILTER, NULL, 0);
> +
> + To set the filters to zero filters is quite obsolete as not readed
read
> + data causes the raw socket to discard the received CAN frames. But
> + having this 'send only' use-case we may remove the receive list in the
> + Kernel to save a little (really a very little!) CPU usage.
> +
> + 4.1.2 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_ERR_FILTER
> +
> + As described in chapter 3.4 the CAN interface driver can generate so
> + called Error Frames that can optionally be passed to the user
> + application on the same way like other CAN frames. The possible
in as
> + errors are devided into different error classes that may be filtered
divided
> + using the appropriate error mask. To register for every possible
> + error condition CAN_ERR_MASK can be used as value for the error mask.
> + The values for the error mask are defined in linux/can/error.h .
> +
> + can_err_mask_t err_mask = ( CAN_ERR_TX_TIMEOUT | CAN_ERR_BUSOFF );
> +
> + setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_ERR_FILTER,
> + &err_mask, sizeof(err_mask));
> +
> + 4.1.3 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK
> +
> + To meet multi user needs the local loopback is enabled by default
> + (see chapter 3.2 for details). But in some embedded use-cases
> + (e.g. when only one application uses the CAN bus) this loopback
> + functionality can be disabled (separately for each socket):
> +
> + int loopback = 0; /* 0 = disabled, 1 = enabled (default) */
> +
> + setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK, &loopback, sizeof(loopback));
> +
> + 4.1.4 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS
> +
> + When the local loopback is enabled, all the sent CAN frames are
> + looped back to the open CAN sockets that registered for the CAN
> + frames' CAN-ID on this given interface to meet the multi user
> + needs. The receiption of the CAN frames on the same socket that was
reception
> + sending the CAN frame is assumed to be unwanted and therefore
> + disabled by default. This default behaviour may be changed on
> + demand:
> +
> + int set_recv_own_msgs = 1; /* 0 = disabled (default), 1 = enabled */
> +
> + setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS,
> + &recv_own_msgs, sizeof(recv_own_msgs));
^^^ and ^^^
variable name is incorrect.
> +
> + 4.2 Broadcast Manager protocol sockets (SOCK_DGRAM)
> + 4.3 connected transport protocols (SOCK_SEQPACKET)
> + 4.4 unconnected transport protocols (SOCK_DGRAM)
> +
> +
> +5. Socket CAN core module
> +-------------------------
> +
> + The Socket CAN core module implements the protocol family
> + PF_CAN. CAN protocol modules are loaded by the core module at
> + runtime. The core module provides an interface for CAN protocol
> + modules to subscribe needed CAN IDs (see chapter 3.1).
> +
> + 5.1 can.ko module params
> +
> + - stats_timer: To calculate the Socket CAN core statistics
> + (e.g. current/maximum frames per second) this 1 second timer is
> + invoked at can.ko module start time by default. This timer can be
> + disabled giving stattimer=0 on the module comandline.
by using
> +
> + - debug: When the Kconfig option CONFIG_CAN_DEBUG_CORE is set at
> + compile time, the debug output code is compiled into the module.
> + debug = 0x01 => print general debug information
> + debug = 0x02 => print content of processed CAN frames
> + debug = 0x04 => print content of processed socket buffers
> +
> + It is possible or have ORed values e.g. 3 or 7 for an output off
to use of
> + all available debug information. Using 0x02 and 0x04 may flood
> + your kernel log - so be careful.
> +
> + 5.2 procfs content
> +
> + As described in chapter 3.1 the Socket CAN core uses several filter
> + lists to deliver received CAN frames to CAN protocol modules. These
> + receive lists, their filters and the count of filter matches can be
> + checked in the appropriate receive list. All entries contain the
> + device and a protocol module identifier:
> +
> + foo@bar:~$ cat /proc/net/can/rcvlist_all
> +
> + receive list 'rx_all':
> + (vcan3: no entry)
> + (vcan2: no entry)
> + (vcan1: no entry)
> + device can_id can_mask function userdata matches ident
> + vcan0 000 00000000 f88e6370 f6c6f400 0 raw
> + (any: no entry)
> +
> + In this example an application requests any CAN traffic from vcan0.
> +
> + rcvlist_all - list for unfiltered entries (no filter operations)
> + rcvlist_eff - list for single extended frame (EFF) entries
> + rcvlist_err - list for error frames masks
> + rcvlist_fil - list for mask/value filters
> + rcvlist_inv - list for mask/value filters (inverse semantic)
> + rcvlist_sff - list for single standard frame (SFF) entries
> +
> + Additional procfs files in /proc/net/can
> +
> + stats - Socket CAN core statistics (rx/tx frames, match ratios, ...)
> + reset_stats - manual statistic reset
> + version - prints the Socket CAN core version and the ABI version
> +
> + 5.3 writing own CAN protocol modules
> +
> + To implement a new protocol in the protocol family PF_CAN a new
> + protocol has to be defined in include/linux/can.h .
> + The prototypes and definitions to use the Socket CAN core can be
> + accessed by including include/linux/can/core.h .
> + Additionally to functions that register the CAN protocol and the
Similar to ...
> + CAN device notifier chain there are functions to subscribe CAN
> + frames received by CAN interfaces and to send CAN frames:
> +
> + can_rx_register - subscribe CAN frames from a specific interface
> + can_rx_unregister - unsubscribe CAN frames from a specific interface
> + can_send - transmit a CAN frame (optional with local loopback)
> +
> + For details see the kerneldoc documentation in net/can/af_can.c or
> + the source code of net/can/raw.c or net/can/bcm.c .
> +
> +6. CAN network drivers
> +----------------------
> +
> + Writing a CAN network device driver is much easier than writing a
> + CAN character device driver. Analogue to other know network device
Similar to other known
> + drivers you mainly have to deal with:
> +
> + - TX: Put the CAN frame from the socket buffer to the CAN controller.
> + - RX: Put the CAN frame from the CAN controller to the socket buffer.
> +
> + See e.g. at Documentation/networking/netdevices.txt . The differences
> + for writing CAN network device driver are described below:
> +
> + 6.1 general settings
> +
> + dev->type = ARPHRD_CAN; /* the netdevice hardware type */
> + dev->flags = IFF_NOARP; /* CAN has no arp */
> +
> + dev->mtu = sizeof(struct can_frame);
> +
> + The struct can_frame is the payload of each socket buffer in the
> + protocol family PF_CAN.
> +
> + 6.2 loopback
> +
> + As described in chapter 3.2 the CAN network device driver should
> + support a local loopback functionality. If so the driver flag
> + IFF_LOOPBACK has to be set to omit the PF_CAN core to perform the
to cause (?)
> + loopback as fallback solution:
> +
> + dev->flags = (IFF_NOARP | IFF_LOOPBACK);
> +
> + 6.3 CAN controller hardware filters
> +
> + To reduce the interrupt load on deep embedded systems some CAN
> + controllers support the filtering of CAN IDs or ranges of CAN IDs.
> + These hardware filter capabilities vary from controller to
> + controller and have to be identified as not feasible in a multi-user
> + networking approach. The use of the very controller specific
> + hardware filters could make sense in a very dedicated use-case, as a
> + filter on driver level would affect all users in the multi-user
> + system. The high efficient filter sets inside the PF_CAN core allow
> + to set different multiple filters for each socket separately.
> + Therefore the use of hardware filters goes to the category 'handmade
> + tuning on deep embedded systems'. The author is running a MPC603e
> + @133MHz with four SJA1000 CAN controllers from 2002 under heavy bus
> + load without any problems ...
> +
> + 6.4 currently supported CAN hardware (May 2007)
> +
> + On the project website http://developer.berlios.de/projects/socketcan
> + there are different drivers available:
> +
> + vcan: Virtual CAN interface driver (if no real hardware is available)
> + sja1000: Philips SJA1000 CAN controller (recommended)
> + i82527: Intel i82527 CAN controller
> + mscan: Motorola/Freescale CAN controller (e.g. inside SOC MPC5200)
> + slcan: For a bunch of CAN adaptors that are attached via a
> + serial line ASCII protocol (for serial / USB adaptors)
> +
> + Additionally the different CAN adaptors (ISA/PCI/PCMCIA/USB/Parport)
> + from PEAK Systemtechnik support the CAN netdevice driver modell
model
> + since Linux driver v6.0: http://www.peak-system.com/linux/index.htm
> +
> + Please check the Mailing Lists on the berlios OSS project website.
> +
> + 6.5 todo (May 2007)
> +
> + The configuration interface for CAN network drivers is still an open
> + issue that has not been finalized in the socketcan project. Also the
> + idea of having a library module (candev.ko) that holds functions
> + that are needed by all CAN netdevices is not ready to ship.
> + Your contribution is welcome.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-17 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-17 10:03 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #6 Urs Thuermann
2007-09-17 10:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] CAN: Allocate protocol numbers for PF_CAN Urs Thuermann
2007-09-18 13:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-17 10:03 ` [PATCH 2/7] CAN: Add PF_CAN core module Urs Thuermann
2007-09-17 15:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-18 13:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-18 14:54 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-18 15:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-18 21:20 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-19 8:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-20 8:53 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-20 10:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-20 11:30 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-20 11:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-17 10:03 ` [PATCH 3/7] CAN: Add raw protocol Urs Thuermann
2007-09-18 14:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-18 21:49 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-19 8:34 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-17 10:03 ` [PATCH 4/7] CAN: Add broadcast manager (bcm) protocol Urs Thuermann
2007-09-17 10:03 ` [PATCH 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Urs Thuermann
2007-09-18 15:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-18 22:24 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-19 6:26 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-09-19 8:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-17 10:03 ` [PATCH 6/7] CAN: Add maintainer entries Urs Thuermann
2007-09-17 10:03 ` [PATCH 7/7] CAN: Add documentation Urs Thuermann
2007-09-17 17:30 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2007-09-17 20:22 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-17 20:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-09-17 20:49 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-17 22:57 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-17 23:19 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-18 6:51 ` Bill Fink
2007-09-18 7:20 ` Urs Thuermann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-16 15:02 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: New PF_CAN protocol family for 2.6.25, update Urs Thuermann
2007-11-16 15:02 ` [PATCH 7/7] CAN: Add documentation Urs Thuermann
2007-11-14 12:13 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: New PF_CAN protocol family for 2.6.25 Urs Thuermann
2007-11-14 12:13 ` [PATCH 7/7] CAN: Add documentation Urs Thuermann
2007-10-05 10:49 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #10 Urs Thuermann
2007-10-05 10:49 ` [PATCH 7/7] CAN: Add documentation Urs Thuermann
2007-10-02 13:10 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #9 Urs Thuermann
2007-10-02 13:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] CAN: Add documentation Urs Thuermann
2007-09-25 12:20 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #8 Urs Thuermann
2007-09-25 12:20 ` [PATCH 7/7] CAN: Add documentation Urs Thuermann
2007-09-20 18:43 [PATCH 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #7 Urs Thuermann
2007-09-20 18:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] CAN: Add documentation Urs Thuermann
2007-08-04 2:06 [patch 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #5 Urs Thuermann
2007-08-04 2:07 ` [patch 7/7] CAN: Add documentation Urs Thuermann
2007-06-22 3:44 [patch 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, try #3 Urs Thuermann
2007-06-22 3:44 ` [patch 7/7] CAN: Add documentation Urs Thuermann
2007-05-30 13:11 [patch 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family, update Urs Thuermann
2007-05-30 13:11 ` [patch 7/7] CAN: Add documentation Urs Thuermann
2007-05-16 14:51 [patch 0/7] CAN: Add new PF_CAN protocol family Urs Thuermann
2007-05-16 14:51 ` [patch 7/7] CAN: Add documentation Urs Thuermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070917103003.109ae665.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de \
--cc=oliver@hartkopp.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urs.thuermann@volkswagen.de \
--cc=urs@isnogud.escape.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.