All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca>
Cc: Rob Hussey <robjhussey@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck@vds.kolivas.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:47:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070917114714.GA32532@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200709170712.03679.edt@aei.ca>


* Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca> wrote:

> I gather this was with the complete -ck patchset?  It would be 
> interesting to see if just SD performed as well.  If it does, CFS 
> needs more work. if not there are other things in -ck that really do 
> improve performance and should be looked into.

also see:

   http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/17/172

i think at least part of the differences is due to the different 
sched_clock() accuracy and performance in v2.6.22-ck versus v2.6.23-cfs.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-17 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-17  9:21 Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up Rob Hussey
2007-09-17 11:12 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-09-17 11:47   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-09-17 20:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-17 11:27 ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]   ` <E1IXMXf-0000uG-ID@flower>
2007-09-17 19:43     ` Willy Tarreau
2007-09-17 20:01       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-17 20:06       ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-17 20:05         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-17 20:42         ` Willy Tarreau
2007-09-17 13:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-17 14:01   ` [ck] " Jos Poortvliet
2007-09-17 14:12     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-17 20:36   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-18  4:30     ` Rob Hussey
2007-09-18  4:53       ` Willy Tarreau
2007-09-18  4:58         ` Rob Hussey
2007-09-18  6:40       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-18  8:23         ` Rob Hussey
2007-09-18  8:48       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-18  9:45         ` Rob Hussey
2007-09-18  9:48           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-18  1:44   ` Rob Hussey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070917114714.GA32532@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=edt@aei.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robjhussey@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.