From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: git-fsck/lost-found's speed vs git-prune's
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:09:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070918090926.GA8927@glandium.org> (raw)
Hi,
I was wondering if that was to be expected for git-fsck to be
significantly slower than git-prune (by several orders of magnitude) ?
$ time git-lost-found
real 8m22.167s
user 6m44.153s
sys 1m16.613s
$ time git-prune
real 0m0.376s
user 0m0.304s
sys 0m0.000s
Mike
next reply other threads:[~2007-09-18 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-18 9:09 Mike Hommey [this message]
2007-09-18 9:14 ` git-fsck/lost-found's speed vs git-prune's Sam Vilain
2007-09-18 9:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-18 9:50 ` Mike Hommey
2007-09-18 11:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070918090926.GA8927@glandium.org \
--to=mh@glandium.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.