From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] lockdep: validate rcu_dereference() vs rcu_read_lock()
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:41:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070919105054.332308000@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070919104125.286538000@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: rcu-lockdep-validate.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4293 bytes --]
Warn when rcu_dereference() is not used in combination with rcu_read_lock()
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/linux/lockdep.h | 4 +++
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 3 ++
kernel/lockdep.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/lockdep.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ extern void lockdep_free_key_range(void
extern void lockdep_off(void);
extern void lockdep_on(void);
+extern int lockdep_enabled(void);
/*
* These methods are used by specific locking variants (spinlocks,
@@ -303,6 +304,8 @@ extern void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_
extern void lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested,
unsigned long ip);
+extern int lock_is_held(struct lockdep_map *lock);
+
# define INIT_LOCKDEP .lockdep_recursion = 0,
#define lockdep_depth(tsk) (debug_locks ? (tsk)->lockdep_depth : 0)
@@ -319,6 +322,7 @@ static inline void lockdep_on(void)
# define lock_acquire(l, s, t, r, c, i) do { } while (0)
# define lock_release(l, n, i) do { } while (0)
+# define lock_is_held(l) (0)
# define lockdep_init() do { } while (0)
# define lockdep_info() do { } while (0)
# define lockdep_init_map(lock, name, key, sub) do { (void)(key); } while (0)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/rcupdate.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -138,9 +138,11 @@ extern int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu);
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
# define rcu_read_acquire() lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map, 0, 0, 2, 1, _THIS_IP_)
# define rcu_read_release() lock_release(&rcu_lock_map, 1, _THIS_IP_)
+# define rcu_read_held() WARN_ON_ONCE(lockdep_enabled() && !lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map))
#else
# define rcu_read_acquire() do { } while (0)
# define rcu_read_release() do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_read_held() do { } while (0)
#endif
/**
@@ -256,6 +258,7 @@ extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
#define rcu_dereference(p) ({ \
typeof(p) _________p1 = ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
+ rcu_read_held(); \
(_________p1); \
})
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -284,6 +284,13 @@ void lockdep_on(void)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_on);
+int lockdep_enabled(void)
+{
+ return debug_locks && !current->lockdep_recursion;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_enabled);
+
/*
* Debugging switches:
*/
@@ -2624,6 +2631,36 @@ static int lock_release_nested(struct ta
return 1;
}
+static int __lock_is_held(struct lockdep_map *lock)
+{
+ struct task_struct *curr = current;
+ struct held_lock *hlock, *prev_hlock;
+ unsigned int depth;
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * Check whether the lock exists in the current stack
+ * of held locks:
+ */
+ depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
+ if (!depth)
+ return 0;
+
+ prev_hlock = NULL;
+ for (i = depth-1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
+ /*
+ * We must not cross into another context:
+ */
+ if (prev_hlock && prev_hlock->irq_context != hlock->irq_context)
+ break;
+ if (hlock->instance == lock)
+ return 1;
+ prev_hlock = hlock;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Remove the lock to the list of currently held locks - this gets
* called on mutex_unlock()/spin_unlock*() (or on a failed
@@ -2727,6 +2764,29 @@ void lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lo
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_release);
+int lock_is_held(struct lockdep_map *lock)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (unlikely(!lock_stat && !prove_locking))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ raw_local_irq_save(flags);
+ check_flags(flags);
+ current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+ ret = __lock_is_held(lock);
+ current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+ raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_is_held);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_STAT
static int
print_lock_contention_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-19 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-19 10:41 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] using lockdep to validate rcu usage Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 10:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] lockdep: annotate rcu_read_{,un}lock{,_bh} Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 23:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-19 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-09-19 14:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] lockdep: validate rcu_dereference() vs rcu_read_lock() Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 15:16 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 15:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 15:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-19 16:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 17:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-19 17:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-19 18:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 19:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 19:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 20:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 20:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 21:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 21:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 21:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-20 17:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-21 0:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-21 14:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-21 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-19 10:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] lockdep: rcu_dereference() vs preempt_disable() Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 10:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] implicit vs explicit preempt_disable() Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 10:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] fixup funny preemption tricks in irq_exit Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 10:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] fixup early boot Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 13:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] using lockdep to validate rcu usage Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070919105054.332308000@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.