From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Hanquez Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxc portability fixes Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:30:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20070920123015.GA30037@snarc.org> References: <200709191519.37628.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> <20070919142515.GA6106@snarc.org> <200709191632.59288.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> <20070919144949.GA7154@snarc.org> <20070919222154.GB25289@totally.trollied.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070919222154.GB25289@totally.trollied.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: John Levon Cc: Christoph Egger , Vincent Hanquez , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:21:54PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Vincent Hanquez wrote: > > > > The glibc people > > > should know that and should deprecate MAP_ANONYMOUS instead. > > > > solaris has deprecated MAP_ANON as well. > > We don't even *document* MAP_ANONYMOUS. Where did you get this > impression from? I actually found that on 2 differents MLs (blender and wine to name them) by some random googling to find the reason it was deprecated on linux (which i still don't know). Cheers, -- Vincent Hanquez