From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [CFT, PATCH] libelf 64bit problems vs. ltrace
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:02:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070921150244.GE5788@aon.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070920092033.GB27699@aon.at>
ping!
I'll happily keep this fixes local if noone cares to double-check that
they help others, too..
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:20:33AM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:36:00PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>>On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:06:54PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
>>>but libvorbis fails to build:
>>>
>>> In file included from mdct.c:44:
>>> ../include/vorbis/codec.h:26:21: error: ogg/ogg.h: No such file or
>>> directory
>>>
>>>Can't seem to be able to build ltrace; something to do with configure not
>>>being able to locate gelf.h, but it's there:
>>>staging_dir/usr/include/libelf, as libelf build ok; I get a configure
>>>error:
>>>
>>> checking gelf.h usability... no
>>> checking gelf.h presence... no
>>> checking for gelf.h... no
>>> configure: error: ***** gelf.h not found *****
>>>
>>>config.log says in more than one place:
>>>
>>> /usr/include/libelf/gelf.h:49:2: error: #error "GElf is not supported on
>>> this sysystem."
>>>
>>>and bails out further down with:
>>>
>>> configure:3629: checking for gelf.h
>>> configure:3636: result: no
>>> configure:3643: error: ***** gelf.h not found *****
>>>
>>>ac_cv_header_gelf_h=no may have something to do with it.
>>>
>>>Any ideas?
>>
>>I've updated ltrace some months ago, but i admit that i have no idea
>>which box this big patches are on :-/
>>...
>>$ ls -ltrn buildroot.mine.OLD.OLD/package/ltrace/
>>total 804
>>-rw-r--r-- 1 1000 1000 627890 Apr 6 14:58 ltrace-svn-20070406.00.patch
>>-rw-r--r-- 1 1000 1000 173414 Apr 6 15:04 ltrace-svn-20070406.01.autoreconf.patch
>>-rw-r--r-- 1 1000 1000 2298 Apr 6 15:07 ltrace.mk
>>-rw-r--r-- 1 1000 40 241 Apr 6 15:25 Config.in
>>
>>I.e. Not too good.
>>
>>Perhaps try this updated version?
>
>The attached builds at least (with largefile enabled for a start).
>Can you confirm that this works for you so i can apply it?
>
>Too big for the list, so it's here:
>http://uclibc.org:/~aldot/buildroot/br2.libelf64-cluebait+ltrace-update.00.diff.bz2
>
>TIA for testing it..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-21 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-19 19:06 [Buildroot] [patch] here are some more cleanup patches Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
2007-09-19 19:36 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-09-20 9:20 ` [Buildroot] [CFT, PATCH] libelf 64bit problems vs. ltrace Bernhard Fischer
2007-09-21 15:02 ` Bernhard Fischer [this message]
2007-09-19 20:14 ` [Buildroot] [patch] here are some more cleanup patches Bernhard Fischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070921150244.GE5788@aon.at \
--to=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.