All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Ulrich Kunitz <kune@deine-taler.de>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>,
	davem@davemloft.net, jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please pull 'z1211' branch of wireless-2.6
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:11:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709221411.12128.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070922094800.GB12327@deine-taler.de>

On Saturday 22 September 2007 11:48:00 Ulrich Kunitz wrote:
> A real high-quality driver will require Johannes' proposed
> mac80211 driver interface changes to be merged and TX
> confirmations handled in a way, that the semantics can really be
> supported by the driver. (Michael Buesh's patch is taping over the
> issue.)

No it is not. It is fixing the issue. It fixes the following issues:
* You must ignore the Txstat-requested bit in the driver.
* You must report bad frames with the excessive_retries set.

The issue you are (most likely) talking about is that we can not
reliably tell whether a frame was good in the driver. That is a different
issue completely seperate from the two points above, which my patch fixes.

With my patch rate-controlling correctly works. Without it does not.

If you find a way to fix the reliable-detection-of-good-TX issue, that's
another good fix. But I think it's not release critical, because the
device works with the current "guessing-around" code. But without the two
points above fixed, it does not correctly work at all (unless you manually
tune to the best rate each time you move the machine).

-- 
Greetings Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-22 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-19 18:10 Please pull 'z1211' branch of wireless-2.6 John W. Linville
2007-09-19 18:59 ` David Miller
2007-09-19 19:23   ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-19 19:56     ` David Miller
2007-09-19 20:12       ` David Miller
2007-09-19 22:08 ` Daniel Drake
2007-09-19 22:14   ` David Miller
2007-09-19 22:27     ` Daniel Drake
2007-09-19 22:32       ` David Miller
2007-09-20 13:47   ` John W. Linville
2007-09-20 14:28     ` Daniel Drake
2007-09-20 16:37       ` Larry Finger
2007-09-20 16:40         ` Johannes Berg
2007-09-22  9:48     ` Ulrich Kunitz
2007-09-22 12:11       ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-09-22 14:42         ` Ulrich Kunitz
2007-09-22 14:47           ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-19 22:12 ` Daniel Drake
2007-09-20 13:28   ` John W. Linville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200709221411.12128.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=kune@deine-taler.de \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.