From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: bind and O_NONBLOCK Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 21:19:51 +0400 Message-ID: <20070922171950.GA1737@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <46F35DD9.4000909@redhat.com> <20070922161414.GA29637@2ka.mipt.ru> <46F540F2.1090109@redhat.com> <20070922165938.GA11234@2ka.mipt.ru> <46F54CA5.8020200@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev , Alan Cox To: Ulrich Drepper Return-path: Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:41363 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750721AbXIVRUJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:20:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46F54CA5.8020200@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 10:11:01AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com) wrote: > Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > Could you point to the original Alan's proposal, I only found short note > > (as in you original mail) at opengroup.org and failed to correctly > > googlify it in the web. > > There was no public mail. I asked RH engineering for proposals for > changes to the POSIX spec and Alan replied. Then I belive RH engineers will implement this issue and you should not send this to netdev@ (maybe only as a warning for all others :) -- Evgeniy Polyakov