From: Thomas Lundquist <lists@zelow.no>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] buildroot with ipkg
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:19:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070922221907.GC711@zelow.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1190496532.46f58914948c8@imp.free.fr>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:28:52PM +0200, julien.boibessot at free.fr wrote:
>
> With the "OpenWrt" method you have:
> * the packages (.ipkg) built for all the Buildroot software you selected with
> menuconfig
> * AND a rootfs with all these packages pre-installed (ready to test your
> configuration)
And a rootfs without any of the packages?
> After that you can upload your packages to your (web)server and share/use them,
> or directly flash the rootfs.
> What I was pointing in my email is that you probably don't need to add your
> "<m>" entry in Buildroot menuconfig. Your option to choose the package type
> should be
> enough: if the user choose to build packages, then you can build them for all
> the selected software.
I kinda like to be able to pick for a base or extras. It may make it a
tad more complex but since I've already solved it, I'm happy.
(Thanks Kconfig :=)
> Sorry, I probably failed to explain my thoughts clearly...
> Why not build all software as packages when the user want it and as "builtin" in
> the other case ?
I want more flexibility. Busybox is an example, it's usually needed to
being able to add a package, so it's a part of the base. or is it if you
add util-linux and gnu tools? so which one should become a package? or
not become one?
The builder (should) know this and do the right pick.
> Don't forget package dependencies...
I'm not bothered with them right now but I do have that on my list of
things to add when I know that it's accepted.
But it should be quite simple with the autotools stuff so I guess I
might start there as soon as I've been able to compile a simple X server
with a few drivers.
> If you need help to integrate ipkg, I have already some modifications of
> Buildroot to share with you, before publishing them.
Sounds good.
Thomas.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-22 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-17 12:09 [Buildroot] buildroot with ipkg pasteur
2007-09-17 19:44 ` Julien Boibessot
2007-09-17 20:14 ` Erik Andersen
2007-09-17 21:17 ` Julien Boibessot
2007-09-19 6:42 ` Thomas Lundquist
2007-09-19 12:17 ` Thomas Lundquist
2007-09-19 19:27 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-09-19 20:56 ` Thomas Lundquist
2007-09-19 21:50 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-09-20 21:16 ` Julien Boibessot
2007-09-20 21:37 ` Thomas Lundquist
2007-09-22 21:28 ` julien.boibessot at free.fr
2007-09-22 21:43 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-09-22 22:19 ` Thomas Lundquist [this message]
2007-09-20 9:06 ` Elizabeth Oldham
2007-09-20 10:52 ` Thomas Lundquist
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-22 22:28 Thomas Lundquist
2007-09-23 20:43 ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-11-14 10:12 ` Thomas Lundquist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070922221907.GC711@zelow.no \
--to=lists@zelow.no \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.