All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Supplant the "while case ... break ;; esac" idiom
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:01:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070924080134.GA9112@artemis.corp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86ejgowl5g.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1190 bytes --]

On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 07:57:31AM +0000, David Kastrup wrote:
> "David Symonds" <dsymonds@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On 24/09/2007, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 10:42:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> >> >> -while case $# in 0) break ;; esac
> >> >> +while test $# != 0
> >> >
> >> > Wouldn't -ne be better ?
> >>
> >> Why?
> >
> > Because -ne does a numeric comparison, != does a string comparison,
> > and it's a numeric comparison happening, semantically speaking.
> 
> I don't see the point in converting $# and 0 into numbers before
> comparing them.  "!=" is quite more readable, and the old code also
> compared the strings.

  Fwiw $# already is a number. Hence test $# -ne 0 is definitely a
better test.

  $# != 0 would yield sth like (strcmp(sprintf("%d", argc), "0"))
  $# -ne 0 would yield sth like (argc != atoi("0")).

  Not that it matters much, but the latter looks better to me.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-24  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-21 21:43 [PATCH] Allow shell scripts to run with non-Bash /bin/sh Eygene Ryabinkin
2007-09-21 23:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-22  0:05   ` David Kastrup
2007-09-22  0:18     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-22  0:21       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-22  0:26       ` David Kastrup
2007-09-22  3:54   ` Eygene Ryabinkin
2007-09-22  4:06     ` David Kastrup
2007-09-22  6:58       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-22  7:34         ` Vineet Kumar
2007-09-22 11:07         ` David Kastrup
2007-09-22  6:54     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-22 21:37       ` Adam Flott
2007-09-22  8:32     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-23  8:31       ` Eygene Ryabinkin
2007-09-23  8:59       ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23 19:20         ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-23 19:33           ` David Kastrup
2007-09-23 20:42             ` [PATCH] Supplant the "while case ... break ;; esac" idiom David Kastrup
2007-09-23 22:20               ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-24  6:22                 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-24 14:24                   ` David Kastrup
2007-09-24 23:31                     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-25  6:13                       ` David Kastrup
2007-09-25  6:29                         ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-25 10:33                           ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-25 10:46                           ` Avi Kivity
2007-09-24  6:05               ` Mike Hommey
2007-09-24  6:26                 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-24  6:30                   ` David Symonds
2007-09-24  7:57                     ` David Kastrup
2007-09-24  8:01                       ` Pierre Habouzit [this message]
2007-09-24  8:04                         ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-09-24 10:33                           ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-24 11:21                             ` Miles Bader
2007-09-24 11:35                               ` Eygene Ryabinkin
2007-09-24 13:45                                 ` Miles Bader
2007-09-24 13:58                                   ` David Kastrup
2007-09-24 14:04                                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-24 14:10                                     ` David Kastrup
2007-09-24 14:58                                     ` Miles Bader
2007-09-24 16:24                                     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-24 11:39                             ` David Kastrup
2007-09-24  8:29                         ` David Kastrup
2007-09-22  2:33 ` [PATCH] Allow shell scripts to run with non-Bash /bin/sh Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070924080134.GA9112@artemis.corp \
    --to=madcoder@debian.org \
    --cc=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.