Re: [PATCH 1/4] hugetlb: search harder for memory in alloc_fresh_huge_page()

[Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>]

On 14.09.2007 [10:43:20 -0700], Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> 
> > Christoph, Lee, ping? I haven't heard any response on these patches this
> > time around. Would it be acceptable to ask Andrew to pick them up for
> > the next -mm?
> 
> I am sorry but there is some churn already going on with other core
> memory management patches. Could we hold this off until the dust
> settles on those and then rebase?

Yes, I'll keep tracking -mm with my series. I wonder, though, if it
would be possible to at least get the bugfixes for memoryless nodes in
hugetlb code (patches 1 and 2) in to -mm sooner rather than later (I can
fix your issues with the static variable, I hope). The other two patches
are more feature-like, so can be postponed for now.

Thanks,
Nish

-- 
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>