From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: lockdep wierdness...
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:00:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070927140007.GA17543@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1190901067.31636.6.camel@twins>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:51:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Christoph,
>
> does Steve's story make sense?
Yes.
> All that would need to be done is add an extra lock_class_key to
> file_system_type for i_mutex_dir_key, and extend alloc_inode to say
> something like:
>
> if (dir)
> lockdep_set_class(&inode->i_mutex, &sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key);
> else
> lockdep_set_class(&inode->i_mutex, &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key);
Unfortunately we don't know what type of inode we have when calling
alloc_inode. We only know it after reading in the inode from disk,
aka in unlock_new_inode. Then again there is no reason to use
i_mutex before unlock_new_inode returns, so maybe we could defer
initializing it until unlock_new_inode. I'm pretty sure we'll have
to fix a few filesystems that take i_mutex before that despite not
needing it, e.g. through i_size_write, though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-27 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-24 22:07 lockdep wierdness Trond Myklebust
2007-09-25 2:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-09-27 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-27 14:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2007-09-27 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070927140007.GA17543@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.