From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IavGB-0000gx-TN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:26:39 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IavGA-0000g5-CB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:26:39 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IavGA-0000g1-4G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:26:38 -0400
Received: from phoenix.bawue.net ([193.7.176.60] helo=mail.bawue.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ths@networkno.de>) id 1IavG9-00027w-IW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:26:37 -0400
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:26:35 +0100
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu linux-user/qemu.h linux-user/signal.c linu...
Message-ID: <20070927152635.GB13317@networkno.de>
References: <E1IatsM-0004DD-6T@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>
	<1190902080.29748.2.camel@jma4.dev.netgem.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1190902080.29748.2.camel@jma4.dev.netgem.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jocelyn Mayer <l_indien@magic.fr>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 13:57 +0000, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > CVSROOT:	/sources/qemu
> > Module name:	qemu
> > Changes by:	Thiemo Seufer <ths>	07/09/27 13:57:58
> > 
> > Modified files:
> > 	linux-user     : qemu.h signal.c syscall.c 
> > 	target-alpha   : cpu.h 
> > 	target-arm     : cpu.h 
> > 	target-i386    : cpu.h 
> > 	target-mips    : cpu.h 
> > 	target-ppc     : cpu.h 
> 
>  static inline target_ulong get_sp_from_cpustate(CPUPPCState *state)
> {
>   return state->gpr[1];
> }
> 
> This is no way related to CPU emulation then has nothing to do in cpu.h.

Agreed, it should be confined to the linux-user implementation.

> Furthermore, there no notion of sigaltstack or even stack pointer in the
> PowerPC specification.

You would need to look in the Linux PPC ABI for that.


Thiemo