From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IavH7-000156-1W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:27:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IavH4-00014r-Ut for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:27:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IavH4-00014o-Pv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:27:34 -0400 Received: from nan.false.org ([208.75.86.248]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IavH4-0002Rt-Cr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:27:34 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:27:32 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] softmmu macro meaning Message-ID: <20070927152732.GA5400@caradoc.them.org> References: <20070927140247.10904gmx1@mx066.gmx.net> <200709271702.46722.clemens.kol@gmx.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200709271702.46722.clemens.kol@gmx.at> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Clemens Kolbitsch Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:02:46PM +0200, Clemens Kolbitsch wrote: > but will kernel mode always use the TLB[0] for address translation (even for > addresses at e.g. 0x0800ffff) and user mode TLB[1] (even for e.g. > 0xc000abcd)? (or the other way round...) Which set of TLBs are used depends completely on the current processor mode. It has nothing to do with the address. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery