From: "Jordan Crouse" <jordan.crouse@amd.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: jkeating@redhat.com, "Joerg Pommnitz" <pommnitz@yahoo.com>,
"Chuck Ebbert" <cebbert@redhat.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: More E820 brokenness
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:34:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070927233408.GD4755@cosmic.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46FC3C5A.2010902@zytor.com>
On 27/09/07 16:27 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > On 27/09/07 15:47 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> Jordan Crouse wrote:
> >>> Breaks on the Geode - original behavior.
> >>>
> >>> I think that having boot_prams.e820_entries != 0 makes the kernel
> >>> assume the e820 data is correct.
> >>>
> >> Okay, now I'm utterly baffled how 2.6.22 ever worked on this Geode,
> >> because this, to the best of my reading, mimics the 2.6.22 behavior
> >> exactly. DID IT REALLY, and/or did you make any kind of configuration
> >> changes?
> >
> > I copied in a 2.6.22 kernel to see that it really did work, and it did.
> > But here's the crazy part - I did a dmesg, and it looks like it
> > *is* using e820 data, and it looks complete (I see the entire map -
> > including the ACPI and reserved blocks way up high).
> >
> > So apparently it was the 2.6.22 code that was buggy, but reading it,
> > I don't immediately see how.
> >
>
> Oh bugger, looks like this one might be genuinely my fault after all.
> The ID check in the new code is buggy.
>
> Can you please test this revised patch out (against current -git)?
> -hpa
>
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/i386/boot/memory.c b/arch/i386/boot/memory.c
> index bccaa1c..84939b7 100644
> --- a/arch/i386/boot/memory.c
> +++ b/arch/i386/boot/memory.c
> @@ -34,17 +34,7 @@ static int detect_memory_e820(void)
> "=m" (*desc)
> : "D" (desc), "a" (0xe820));
>
> - /* Some BIOSes stop returning SMAP in the middle of
> - the search loop. We don't know exactly how the BIOS
> - screwed up the map at that point, we might have a
> - partial map, the full map, or complete garbage, so
> - just return failure. */
> - if (id != SMAP) {
> - count = 0;
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - if (err)
> + if (id != SMAP || err)
> break;
>
> count++;
That looks the same as the previous patch you sent?
Jordan
--
Jordan Crouse
Systems Software Development Engineer
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-27 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-27 22:17 More E820 brokenness H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-27 22:33 ` Jordan Crouse
2007-09-27 22:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-27 23:15 ` Jordan Crouse
2007-09-27 23:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-27 23:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-27 23:34 ` Jordan Crouse [this message]
2007-09-27 23:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-27 23:54 ` Jordan Crouse
2007-09-28 0:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-28 13:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070927233408.GD4755@cosmic.amd.com \
--to=jordan.crouse@amd.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jkeating@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pommnitz@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.