From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org
Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH] [NETNS45] network namespace locking rules
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:36:54 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070928143654.GA14129@iris.sw.ru> (raw)
Current locking for network namespace list/initialization is broken.
for_each_net is called under single rtnl_lock in
register_netdevice_notifier.
Locking:
net_mutex -> rtnl_lock() -> dev_base_lock
Reasoning:
- net_mutex holds serialization of the addition/removal of
subsystems/modules and the creation/destruction of network
namespaces as a whole
- loopback device is one of such subsystems and it takes
rtnl_lock inside
- per/namespace RTNL netlink socket requires an iteration over
namespace list inside rtnl_unlock, which is called inside net_mutex
Resume:
net_namespace_list is guarded by both rtnl_lock & net_mutex and
can be safely iterated under any of them
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
--------
diff --git a/include/net/net_namespace.h b/include/net/net_namespace.h
index b8186ea..2845992 100644
--- a/include/net/net_namespace.h
+++ b/include/net/net_namespace.h
@@ -174,8 +174,21 @@ static inline void release_net(struct net *net)
atomic_dec(&net->use_count);
}
-extern void net_lock(void);
-extern void net_unlock(void);
+/*
+ * Locking:
+ * net_mutex -> rtnl_lock() -> dev_base_lock
+ * Reasoning:
+ * - net_mutex holds serialization of the addition/removal of
+ * subsystems/modules and the creation/destruction of network
+ * namespaces as a whole
+ * - loopback device is one of such subsystems and it takes
+ * rtnl_lock inside
+ * - per/namespace RTNL netlink socket requires an iteration over
+ * namespace list inside rtnl_unlock, which is called inside net_mutex
+ * Resume:
+ * net_namespace_list is guarded by both rtnl_lock & net_mutex and
+ * can be safely iterated under any of them
+ */
#define for_each_net(VAR) \
list_for_each_entry(VAR, &net_namespace_list, list)
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index 026e39a..07682a2 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
/*
* Our network namespace constructor/destructor lists
+ * Locking rules are described in details in include/net/net_namespace.h
*/
static LIST_HEAD(pernet_list);
@@ -24,16 +25,6 @@ static struct kmem_cache *net_cachep;
struct net init_net;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_net);
-void net_lock(void)
-{
- mutex_lock(&net_list_mutex);
-}
-
-void net_unlock(void)
-{
- mutex_unlock(&net_list_mutex);
-}
-
static struct net *net_alloc(void)
{
return kmem_cache_alloc(net_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -71,9 +62,9 @@ static void cleanup_net(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
/* Don't let anyone else find us. */
- net_lock();
+ rtnl_lock();
list_del(&net->list);
- net_unlock();
+ rtnl_unlock();
/* Run all of the network namespace exit methods */
pernet_count = 0;
@@ -193,9 +184,9 @@ struct net *copy_net_ns(unsigned long flags, struct net *old_net)
if (err)
goto out_unlock;
- net_lock();
+ rtnl_lock();
list_add_tail(&new_net->list, &net_namespace_list);
- net_unlock();
+ rtnl_unlock();
out_unlock:
@@ -220,14 +211,13 @@ static int __init net_ns_init(void)
mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
err = setup_net(&init_net);
- net_lock();
+ rtnl_lock();
list_add_tail(&init_net.list, &net_namespace_list);
- net_unlock();
+ rtnl_unlock();
mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
if (err)
panic("Could not setup the initial network namespace");
-
return 0;
}
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 82ebc23..e610313 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -73,16 +73,24 @@ void __rtnl_unlock(void)
void rtnl_unlock(void)
{
struct net *net;
- mutex_unlock(&rtnl_mutex);
-
- net_lock();
+
+retry:
for_each_net(net) {
struct sock *rtnl = net->rtnl;
+
+ if (rtnl == NULL || rtnl->sk_receive_queue.qlen == 0)
+ continue;
+
+ get_net(net);
+ mutex_unlock(&rtnl_mutex);
if (rtnl && rtnl->sk_receive_queue.qlen)
rtnl->sk_data_ready(rtnl, 0);
- }
- net_unlock();
+ mutex_lock(&rtnl_mutex);
+ put_net(net);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&rtnl_mutex);
netdev_run_todo();
}
next reply other threads:[~2007-09-28 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-28 14:36 Denis V. Lunev [this message]
[not found] ` <20070928143654.GA14129-aPCOdVxUTlgvJsYlp49lxw@public.gmane.org>
2007-09-28 15:10 ` [PATCH] [NETNS45] network namespace locking rules Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <46FD196C.6080309-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2007-09-28 16:33 ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-09-28 16:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <m1d4w2d92m.fsf-T1Yj925okcoyDheHMi7gv2pdwda3JcWeAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2007-09-28 17:02 ` Denis V. Lunev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070928143654.GA14129@iris.sw.ru \
--to=den-gefaqzzx7r8dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.