From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:42562 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752222AbXI2C66 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:58:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:42:34 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org, "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless Subject: Re: Linux wireless driver procedures Message-ID: <20070929024234.GA15696@kroah.com> References: <43e72e890709281840h21b1ddebpfe45e6b24dd2c9ac@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890709281851r7bb7d515le58fb4051761cadf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <43e72e890709281851r7bb7d515le58fb4051761cadf@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:51:00PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On 9/28/07, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > FYI, > > > > We have set up procedures for vendors wanting to get free wireless > > drivers written for Linux. These procedures can be found at: > > > > http://linuxwireless.org/en/vendors/DriverDevelopment > > > > Perhaps we should create sections on the linuxdriverproject.org page > > and for each one link to procedures if they exist? > > Now that I think about it, these procedures may be a bit outdated, > taking into consideration: > > http://linuxdriverproject.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/CompanyProcess > > should we simply refer to that page and have the companies go through > the project managers? Hmm... I'd prefer if there not be a different proceedure for every type of driver, in the end, they all need to do the same thing, work :) thanks, greg k-h