From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Maarten Bressers <mbres@gentoo.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix compiler warnings for 2.6.23-rc8 on x86_64
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:43:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070929024347.GB15696@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070929000447.ACC7A65737@smtp.gentoo.org>
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 12:04:47AM +0000, Maarten Bressers wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:49:26 -0700
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 08:56:30PM +0000, Maarten Bressers wrote:
> > > This (trivial) patch fixes two compiler warnings for 2.6.23-rc8 on x86_64,
> > > use of deprecated function pci_find_device() and a section mismatch.
> > > Build log and .config file included.
> > >
> > > Signed-off by: Maarten Bressers <mbres@gentoo.org>
> > >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/search.c b/drivers/pci/search.c
> > > index c6e79d0..0eb7e9e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/search.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/search.c
> > > @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ pci_find_slot(unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn)
> > > {
> > > struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
> > >
> > > - while ((dev = pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev)) != NULL) {
> > > + while ((dev = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev)) != NULL) {
> > > if (dev->bus->number == bus && dev->devfn == devfn)
> > > return dev;
> > > }
> >
> > This is not a trivial patch, it changes the behavior of the code and is
> > buggy.
> >
> > Please read the documentationfor pci_get_device() on how to use it
> > properly. It can not be used in pci_find_slot() as the reference
> > counting will be all wrong. You need to just work to get rid of
> > pci_find_slot() and then remove the whole function to get rid of the
> > warning :)
> >
> > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_find_device);
> > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_find_slot);
> >
> > What about the modules that want to use these functions? Are they all
> > now gone? If so, just drop the whole function.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Greg, thank you for your reply. It seems I'm out of my league here, I
> just thought I could quickly fix two compiler warnings, obviously this
> is not the case. I've read the documentation, but I don't think I'll be
> able to fix this. Sorry for the noise.
No problem, and I don't mean to scare you away at all. If you want to
work toward getting rid of all of the callers of the pci_find_slot()
function, that would be best, and then the function can be deleted.
If you have questions on how to do that, feel free to ask.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-29 3:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-29 0:04 [PATCH] Fix compiler warnings for 2.6.23-rc8 on x86_64 Maarten Bressers
2007-09-29 2:43 ` Greg KH [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-28 23:02 Maarten Bressers
2007-09-28 20:56 Maarten Bressers
2007-09-28 21:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-28 22:49 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070929024347.GB15696@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbres@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.