From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Denys Vlasenko Subject: Re: [BUG] 5.0.0_beta1: does not auto-unmount Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:25:16 +0100 Message-ID: <200709300225.16952.vda.linux@googlemail.com> References: <200709261123.41401.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <200709272114.11469.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <1190949750.3464.4.camel@raven.themaw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1190949750.3464.4.camel@raven.themaw.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org To: Ian Kent Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org > > autofs-5.0.2 still references www.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v4/: > > > > # grep -r /v4 . > > ./INSTALL: from http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v4. > > ./autofs.spec:Source: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v4/autofs-%{version}.tar.gz > > ./gentoo/net-fs/autofs/autofs-5.0.2.ebuild:SRC_URI_BASE="mirror://kernel/linux/daemons/${PN}/v4" > > Ha, missed that completely. > Thnks. > > > > > What do you think about removing autofs-5.0.0_beta1.tar.* from .../v4 directory > > in order to prevent confusion? > > Yes, I'd like to but I was a bit concerned that distros that pull these > tarballs might expect them to be present. > > Maybe I could encourage an update if I did, which would be desirable. I mean, by removing 5.0.0beta from v4 directory you will avoid having confused users thinking that 5.0.0_beta1 is latest. I tried 5.0.2 today, summary: -s --stderr missing -f --foreground works, not mentioned in help text I didn't go further, can't say whether it works for me. Will test 5.0.3 whenever you want. -- vda