All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, menage@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dino@in.ibm.com, cpw@sgi.com,
	mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:46:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071003104640.85c8208b.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710030630.19850.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>

Nick wrote:
> So if a new pdflush is spawned, it get's moved to some cpuset? That
> probably isn't something these realtime systems want to do (ie. the
> non-realtime portion probably doesn't want to have any sort of scheduler
> or even worry about cpusets at all).

No - the new pdflush is put in the same cpuset as its parent, with a
patch that I sent in early this year.  See the following code in
mm/pdflush.c:

        /*
         * Some configs put our parent kthread in a limited cpuset,
         * which kthread() overrides, forcing cpus_allowed == CPU_MASK_ALL.
         * Our needs are more modest - cut back to our cpusets cpus_allowed.
         * This is needed as pdflush's are dynamically created and destroyed.
         * The boottime pdflush's are easily placed w/o these 2 lines.
         */
        cpus_allowed = cpuset_cpus_allowed(current);
        set_cpus_allowed(current, cpus_allowed);

        return __pdflush(&my_work);

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-03 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-30 10:44 [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag Paul Jackson
2007-09-29 19:21 ` Nick Piggin
2007-09-30 18:07   ` Paul Jackson
2007-09-30  3:34     ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-01  3:42       ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 13:05         ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03  6:58           ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 16:09             ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03  9:55               ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 17:56                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 11:38                   ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 19:25                     ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 12:14                       ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 19:53                         ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 12:41                           ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 20:30                             ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 17:46                               ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2007-10-03 12:17                   ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 20:31                     ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 17:44                       ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-01 18:15       ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 13:35         ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03  6:22           ` [patch] sched: fix sched-domains partitioning by cpusets Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03  6:56             ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 15:46               ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03  9:21                 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 17:23                   ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 10:08                     ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-03  9:35                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03  9:39                     ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 17:29                       ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-03  7:20               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-03  7:25           ` [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag Paul Jackson
2007-10-02 16:14             ` Nick Piggin
2007-09-30 10:44 ` [PATCH] cpuset decrustify update and validate masks Paul Jackson
2007-09-30 17:33 ` [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag Ingo Molnar
2007-10-02 20:22 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-10-02 20:57   ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071003104640.85c8208b.pj@sgi.com \
    --to=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cpw@sgi.com \
    --cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.