From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@sw.ru>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH][NETNS] Move some code into __init section when CONFIG_NET_NS=n
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:02:02 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071004140202.GA6180@localhost.sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4704F083.7090203@openvz.org>
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:54:11PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> With the net namespaces many code leaved the __init section,
> thus making the kernel occupy more memory than it did before.
> Since we have a config option that prohibits the namespace
> creation, the functions that initialize/finalize some netns
> stuff are simply not needed and can be freed after the boot.
>
> Currently, this is almost not noticeable, since few calls
> are no longer in __init, but when the namespaces will be
> merged it will be possible to free more code. I propose to
> use the __net_init, __net_exit and __net_initdata "attributes"
> for functions/variables that are not used if the CONFIG_NET_NS
> is not set to save more space in memory.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> +#define __net_init
> +#define __net_exit
> +#define __net_initdata
> +#else
> +#define __net_init __init
> +#define __net_exit __exit
> +#define __net_initdata __initdata
> +#endif
Yet another set of double-underscored section annotations is the last thing
that is needed, methinks. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-04 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-04 13:54 [PATCH][NETNS] Move some code into __init section when CONFIG_NET_NS=n Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-04 14:02 ` Alexey Dobriyan [this message]
2007-10-08 7:17 ` [Devel] " David Miller
2007-10-08 7:30 ` David Miller
2007-10-08 7:18 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071004140202.GA6180@localhost.sw.ru \
--to=adobriyan@sw.ru \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.