From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Subject: Re: [patch 02/17] PCI Error Recovery: Symbios SCSI base support Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:32:37 -0500 Message-ID: <20071004173237.GG4338@austin.ibm.com> References: <200710022138.l92Lc0sG023555@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <20071002214926.GY12049@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:37949 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752018AbXJDRdC (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:33:02 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l94HX1b8025413 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:33:01 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l94HX1OW555128 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:33:01 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l94HWooC009164 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:32:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071002214926.GY12049@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, willy@debian.org On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:49:26PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:38:00PM -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > > From: Linas Vepstas > > > > Various PCI bus errors can be signaled by newer PCI controllers. This > > patch adds the PCI error recovery callbacks to the Symbios SCSI device > > driver. The patch has been tested, and appears to work well. > > Linas and I have been discussing the problems with this patch. I think > we have a solution; we certainly have something in my tree that's > acceptable to me; he'd jus like to test it before it's unleashed on the > world. Matthew, your fix was a patch on top of my patch ... I assume you want to submit it that way, instead of reworking this patch? Anyway, I finally got a chance to run it yesterday, it worked fine. I'll try to make final coments in the other thread. --linas