From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, devel@openvz.org,
containers@lists.osdl.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] unify netlink kernel socket recognition
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:47:43 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071005144743.GA7105@iris.sw.ru> (raw)
There are currently two ways to determine whether the netlink socket is a
kernel one or a user one. This patch creates a single inline call for
this purpose and unifies all the calls in the af_netlink.c
No similar calls are found outside af_netlink.c.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
--- ./net/netlink/af_netlink.c.nlk4 2007-08-26 19:30:38.000000000 +0400
+++ ./net/netlink/af_netlink.c 2007-10-02 12:27:33.000000000 +0400
@@ -92,6 +92,11 @@ static inline struct netlink_sock *nlk_s
return container_of(sk, struct netlink_sock, sk);
}
+static inline int netlink_is_kernel(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return nlk_sk(sk)->flags & NETLINK_KERNEL_SOCKET;
+}
+
struct nl_pid_hash {
struct hlist_head *table;
unsigned long rehash_time;
@@ -489,7 +494,7 @@ static int netlink_release(struct socket
module_put(nlk->module);
netlink_table_grab();
- if (nlk->flags & NETLINK_KERNEL_SOCKET) {
+ if (netlink_is_kernel(sk)) {
kfree(nl_table[sk->sk_protocol].listeners);
nl_table[sk->sk_protocol].module = NULL;
nl_table[sk->sk_protocol].registered = 0;
@@ -716,7 +721,7 @@ static struct sock *netlink_getsockbypid
/* Don't bother queuing skb if kernel socket has no input function */
nlk = nlk_sk(sock);
- if ((nlk->pid == 0 && !nlk->data_ready) ||
+ if ((netlink_is_kernel(sock) && !nlk->data_ready) ||
(sock->sk_state == NETLINK_CONNECTED &&
nlk->dst_pid != nlk_sk(ssk)->pid)) {
sock_put(sock);
@@ -762,7 +767,7 @@ int netlink_attachskb(struct sock *sk, s
test_bit(0, &nlk->state)) {
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
if (!timeo) {
- if (!ssk || nlk_sk(ssk)->pid == 0)
+ if (!ssk || netlink_is_kernel(ssk))
netlink_overrun(sk);
sock_put(sk);
kfree_skb(skb);
@@ -861,7 +875,7 @@ int netlink_has_listeners(struct sock *s
int res = 0;
unsigned long *listeners;
- BUG_ON(!(nlk_sk(sk)->flags & NETLINK_KERNEL_SOCKET));
+ BUG_ON(!netlink_is_kernel(sk));
rcu_read_lock();
listeners = rcu_dereference(nl_table[sk->sk_protocol].listeners);
next reply other threads:[~2007-10-05 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-05 14:47 Denis V. Lunev [this message]
2007-10-11 4:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] unify netlink kernel socket recognition David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071005144743.GA7105@iris.sw.ru \
--to=den@openvz.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.