Re: [lm-sensors] Help wanted: individual alarm files

[Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>]

On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 22:00:05 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> The future libsensors assumes that all hardware monitoring drivers
> follow the standard sysfs interface defined in
> Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface. They all mostly do already, except
> for one thing: alarms. Most drivers are still only exposing a single
> file with all alarms in a bit-vector, in chip-dependent order. In order
> to let the new libsenors display the alarms properly, we must add
> individual alarm files to these drivers. For some drivers, fault and/or
> beep files need to be added too.
> 
> Here's the current status, to the best of my knowledge.

Updated list:

Recently converted:
adm1021.c (Krzysztof Helt)
lm78.c (Jean Delvare)
lm85.c (Jean Delvare)
lm87.c (Jean Delvare)
thmc50.c (Krzysztof Helt)
w83791d.c (Charles Spirakis)
w83792d.c (Gong Jun)

Superseded by a newer driver:
fscher.c
fscpos.c

Still need to be converted:
adm1025.c
adm1026.c
adm1031.c
adm9240.c
asb100.c
gl518sm.c
gl520sm.c
it87.c
lm77.c
lm80.c
lm92.c
max1619.c
pc87360.c
sis5595.c (Ivo Manco volunteered)
smsc47m1.c
via686a.c
vt8231.c
w83627hf.c (Carlos Olalla Martínez volunteered)
w83781d.c

The list is shorter, thanks to everyone who helped so far. More help
would of course be appreciated, as we are about to release lm-sensors
3.0.0 and it needs these individual alarm files. I will try to convert
some more drivers this afternoon, next on my list is w83781d.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors