From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id l98C7DGj013769 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:07:13 -0400 Received: from ccerelrim02.cce.hp.com (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l98C7Bts029129 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:07:11 GMT From: Paul Moore To: James Morris Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] Added new checks for labeled IPsec & SECMARK [en|dis]able Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:06:59 -0400 Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, Eric Paris References: <20071005192619.28034.62276.stgit@flek.americas.hpqcorp.net> <200710071955.26628.paul.moore@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <200710071955.26628.paul.moore@hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <200710080806.59404.paul.moore@hp.com> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Sunday 07 October 2007 7:55:26 pm Paul Moore wrote: > On Sunday 07 October 2007 5:53:11 pm James Morris wrote: > > I think it'd be good to get these into 2.6.24. Any acks/nacks ? Sorry, I thought you were asking just about the last patch (dynamic enable/disable) and not the whole patchset. I don't think we're going to be ready for 2.6.24 with these patches. My goal at this point is to get these three patches, the new unified peer label access controls and the work Venkat has been doing on flow control into 2.6.25. This should give us plenty of time to get the userspace pieces into place and perform a decent amount of testing on the whole combination. -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.