From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>
To: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinuxrt@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Cyclictest expected results
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:06:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071008140650.GJ23573@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1985e0f60710070550w47b1ccd7na897920cbd0aeb40@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 06:20:29PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> I am also getting :
> root@rd cycletest]# ./cyclictest -t 1 -p80 -n -i 10000 -l 10000 -q
> T: 0 ( 2709) P:80 I:10000 C: 10000 Min: 8 Act: 16 Avg: 16 Max: 44
> [root@rd cycletest]# ./cyclictest -t 1 -p80 -i 10000 -l 10000 -q
> T: 0 ( 2723) P:80 I:10000 C: 10000 Min: 21 Act: 30 Avg: 29 Max: 139
> [root@rd cycletest]#
Doesn't look too bad.
> I am quite strange why I start getting RT performance with ACPI. why I
> need ACPI on my PC, I dont even use ACPI on my Laptop.
acpi_pm provides a proper clocksource to your system which is a) sane
and b) has enough resolution.
> But I am not able to see performance difference in my GNOME
> Environment. It is still very very slow, how can I boost X-Windows by
> -rt patch.
I'm not sure what you are expecting here? Realtime is about guaranteed
latencies, not about speed.
Robert
--
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Entwicklungszentrum Nord http://www.pengutronix.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-08 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-30 15:37 Cyclictest expected results Jaswinder Singh
2007-09-30 18:32 ` Robert Schwebel
2007-09-30 22:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-09-30 22:26 ` Robert Schwebel
2007-09-30 23:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-01 3:30 ` Jaswinder Singh
2007-10-02 6:54 ` Robert Schwebel
2007-10-07 12:50 ` Jaswinder Singh
2007-10-08 14:06 ` Robert Schwebel [this message]
2007-10-08 14:46 ` Jaswinder Singh
2007-10-08 15:09 ` Jaswinder Singh
2007-10-08 15:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-08 14:55 ` Theodore Tso
2007-10-08 14:55 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071008140650.GJ23573@pengutronix.de \
--to=r.schwebel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=jaswinderlinuxrt@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.