From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:42:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:21666 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20022194AbXJHOmY (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:42:24 +0100 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l98EfmY5026824; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:41:48 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l98Ef6ro026805; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:41:06 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:41:06 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Franck Bui-Huu Cc: Thiemo Seufer , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/pg-r4k.c: Dump the generated code Message-ID: <20071008144106.GA11142@linux-mips.org> References: <20071002154918.GA11312@linux-mips.org> <47038874.9050704@gmail.com> <20071003131158.GL16772@networkno.de> <4703F155.4000301@gmail.com> <20071003201800.GP16772@networkno.de> <47049734.6050802@gmail.com> <20071004121557.GA28928@linux-mips.org> <4705004C.5000705@gmail.com> <20071005115151.GA16145@linux-mips.org> <470A3AA7.7030700@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <470A3AA7.7030700@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 16885 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:11:51PM +0200, Franck Bui-Huu wrote: > Ralf Baechle wrote: > > 6828 bytes isn't totally amazing but since the optimization is reasonable > > clean I'm going to queue this one also. > > > > Yes and maybe it worths to queue this on top of your patch ? Well, if they're lucky enough they make it to the BUG_ON(). But for many of the missconfiguration scenarios the sympthoms would be more subtle. Queued for 2.6.24. Thanks, Ralf