From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: Cyclictest expected results Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:55:09 -0400 Message-ID: <20071008145508.GA29081@thunk.org> References: <1985e0f60709300837l1b16deedgb15575bc73a729ad@mail.gmail.com> <20070930183253.GW23573@pengutronix.de> <1985e0f60709302030q62d19dd3q398a5d0685353786@mail.gmail.com> <20071002065451.GM23573@pengutronix.de> <1985e0f60710070550w47b1ccd7na897920cbd0aeb40@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Robert Schwebel , Thomas Gleixner , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Jaswinder Singh Return-path: Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:47340 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751542AbXJHOzT (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:55:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1985e0f60710070550w47b1ccd7na897920cbd0aeb40@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 06:20:29PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > But I am not able to see performance difference in my GNOME > Environment. It is still very very slow, how can I boost X-Windows by > -rt patch. There are many reasons why GNOME performance might be slow. Stupid application design going to helped by some magic kernel patch. Keep in mind the GNOME doesn't run with real-time priority levels; neither does the X server. The -rt patch isn't magic; no RTOS is magic. A large amount of application design and reworking in order to properly utilize the POSIX real-time interfaces. - Ted