From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:41:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:50406 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20022957AbXJHQlb (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:41:31 +0100 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l98GfU9I007634; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:41:30 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l98GfUDg007633; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:41:30 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:41:30 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Franck Bui-Huu , Thiemo Seufer , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/pg-r4k.c: Dump the generated code Message-ID: <20071008164130.GA7538@linux-mips.org> References: <20071003201800.GP16772@networkno.de> <47049734.6050802@gmail.com> <20071004121557.GA28928@linux-mips.org> <4705004C.5000705@gmail.com> <20071004153008.GE6897@linux-mips.org> <20071004154215.GA10682@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 16893 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:46:17PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > The DECs should be reletively easy if we finally managed to get rid of > > all the 64-bit-isms in the 32-bit kernel even if built for MIPS III or > > above. Which, given the recent commitment to 32-bit cores is what I would > > actually expect. > > On the second thought though -- I am afraid is still > the big showstopper. Or actually the design around it. That does not > mean it is undoable, but I shall defer it for now. There will be a few more issues so I guess we best tackle this step by step. Ralf