From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:02:20 -0300 From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] My suggestions for OP next steps Message-ID: <20071008170219.GB7807@idolize.conectiva> References: <2F7D63A21DB2C74EB8EB8C09AF667DB0130D182D@eitc220.eitc.epson.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2F7D63A21DB2C74EB8EB8C09AF667DB0130D182D@eitc220.eitc.epson.com> List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Petrie, Glen" Cc: printing-architecture@lists.freestandards.org Ok, thank you. On Seg Out 08, 2007 at 10:01:20 -0700, Petrie, Glen wrote: > Local channel here means USB, parallel. We would deal with networked (not > local) next version. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [mailto:mrl@mandriva.com] > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 9:50 AM > To: Petrie, Glen > Cc: printing-architecture@lists.freestandards.org > Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] My suggestions for OP next steps > > On Sex Out 05, 2007 at 12:37:31 -0700, Petrie, Glen wrote: > > [ This is does not include my work on embedded thin thread. ] > > > > > > > > - OP should evaluate our short-/mid-/long-term directions > > > > > > > > - Short - OP should specify guidelines for printer driver test tools > > > > - Directory names and calling sequence (printer name) > > > > - Send data direct to printer via local channel only? > > What do you mean by this topic above? > local channel would be the device itself? > > Thanks, > Marcelo. ---end quoted text---