From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: raw PF_PACKET protocol selection Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:34:38 +0400 Message-ID: <20071009073437.GA1951@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <00ac01c80a3a$cc83a6a0$04ac10ac@Jocke> <20071009071338.GA15057@2ka.mipt.ru> <1191914858.6682.75.camel@gentoo-jocke.transmode.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "'Herbert Xu'" , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Joakim Tjernlund Return-path: Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:41777 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752475AbXJIHez (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2007 03:34:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1191914858.6682.75.camel@gentoo-jocke.transmode.se> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 09:27:38AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund (joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se) wrote: > > Did you change eth_type_trans() to catch your proto? > > > > Just fond out something: > if I redirect my prog like so: > ./sniff > log > and press Ctrl-C after a packet has been sent to it, > it does NOT work. I don't get ANY output in my "log" file, not > even the printf("---------\n") appears. > But if I run whithout redirect it works(at least with ETH_P_BPQ) > Anyone else see this too? I only tested with IP and ARP packets - I can not say when packet was actually received and written to log, but it does start filling up, but maybe not immediately - it can be output buffering in shell though. -- Evgeniy Polyakov