From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@linux-foundation.org,
takano@axe-inc.co.jp
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] [TCP]: Limit processing lost_retrans loop to work-to-do cases
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:44:03 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071010.024403.116354578.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11919324033627-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:20:02 +0300
> This addition of lost_retrans_low to tcp_sock might be
> unnecessary, it's not clear how often lost_retrans worker is
> executed when there wasn't work to do.
>
> Cc: TAKANO Ryousei <takano@axe-inc.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
I wanted to apply this, but it doesn't go cleanly on top of
net-2.6.24, can you respin this patch for me?
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-10 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-09 12:19 [RFC PATCH net-2.6.24 0/3]: Attempt to fix lost_retrans brokeness Ilpo Järvinen
2007-10-09 12:20 ` [PATCH] [TCP]: Separate lost_retrans loop into own function Ilpo Järvinen
2007-10-09 12:20 ` [RFC PATCH] [TCP]: Fix lost_retrans loop vs fastpath problems Ilpo Järvinen
2007-10-09 12:20 ` [RFC PATCH] [TCP]: Limit processing lost_retrans loop to work-to-do cases Ilpo Järvinen
2007-10-10 9:44 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-10-10 9:44 ` David Miller
2007-10-11 1:55 ` [RFC PATCH] [TCP]: Fix lost_retrans loop vs fastpath problems TAKANO Ryousei
2007-10-11 10:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2007-10-11 13:51 ` Regression in net-2.6.24? TAKANO Ryousei
2007-10-11 23:48 ` David Miller
2007-10-11 23:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-12 0:17 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 0:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-12 0:40 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 0:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-12 1:00 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 1:03 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 1:14 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 1:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-12 1:25 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 3:17 ` Michael Chan
2007-10-12 2:40 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 8:54 ` Michael Chan
2007-10-12 8:39 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 10:22 ` TAKANO Ryousei
2007-10-12 10:56 ` David Miller
2007-10-10 9:45 ` [PATCH] [TCP]: Separate lost_retrans loop into own function David Miller
2007-10-09 13:03 ` [RFC PATCH net-2.6.24 0/3]: Attempt to fix lost_retrans brokeness Ilpo Järvinen
2007-10-10 9:48 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071010.024403.116354578.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=takano@axe-inc.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.