From: Andras.Horvath@cern.ch
To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Intel Clovertown vs. frequency scaling
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:01:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071012150126.GY6058@cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <653FFBB4508B9042B5D43DC9E18836F5017D897B@scsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com>
> With latest kernels (2.6.22 and beyond) you should use acpi-cpufreq and
> not speedstep-centrino.
ah, thanks. :-) I found that that too was compiled in (and in fact
that's what's driving the Woodcrest box as well).
> The frequencies supported depends on bus speed and voltages supported by
> the CPU. I think the thing here is you have a low voltage part which is
> already running at lowest possible voltage and does not support any more
> frequency/voltage reduction.
Hm. So there are no P* states available (always running at top speed)
but the CPU just goes to some C* state when it's idle?
This looks right (even if I find it strange) as the specs
(http://download.intel.com/design/Xeon/datashts/31556903.pdf ) say that
"Note: Not all Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5300 Series are capable
of supporting Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology. More details on which
processor frequencies will support this feature will be provided in
future releases of the Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5300 Series NDA
Specification Update when available."
Nevertheless http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SLAEN
says the L5335 has Enhanced Intel Speedstep support.
> You mentioned that cpufreq works fine on Woodcrest, Intel L5160.
> What are the freqs supported and what is the max freq for this part?
As I said I was mistaken and it's using acpi-cpufreq. However, this:
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5160 @ 3.00GHz
supports the following frequencies (2.6.23):
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
2997000 2664000 2331000 1998000
Also, I have found myself another Clovertown:
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5345 @ 2.33GHz
and this seems not to support no frequency scaling, no C-states, only
thermal throttling. Can this be true? From the specs mentioned above I'd
have expected at least some sort of halt state.
http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL9YL says 'enhanced
intel speedstep' and C1E support, same as Mr. L5335 above.
I'm getting more and more confused about this :)
Andras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-12 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-11 15:06 Intel Clovertown vs. frequency scaling Andras.Horvath
2007-10-11 15:25 ` Jarod Wilson
2007-10-11 15:32 ` Stephen J. Gowdy
2007-10-11 15:37 ` Jarod Wilson
2007-10-11 17:15 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-10-12 15:01 ` Andras.Horvath [this message]
2007-10-12 16:44 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-11-02 16:37 ` Andras.Horvath
2007-11-04 23:24 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071012150126.GY6058@cern.ch \
--to=andras.horvath@cern.ch \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.