From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "J. Mayer" <l_indien@magic.fr>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:30:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710150330.55998.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1192362267.9976.383.camel@rapid>
On Sunday 14 October 2007, J. Mayer wrote:
> Here's an updated version of the code fetch optimisation patch against
> current CVS.
> As a remainder, this patch avoid use of softmmu helpers to fetch the
> code in most case. A new target define TARGET_HAS_VLE_INSNS has been
> added which is used to handle the case of an instruction that span 2
> pages, when the target CPU uses a variable-length instructions encoding.
> For pure RISC, the code fetch is done using raw access routines.
> + unsigned long phys_pc;
> + unsigned long phys_pc_start;
These are ram offsets, not physical addresses. I recommend naming them as such
to avoid confusion.
> + opc = glue(glue(lds,SUFFIX),MEMSUFFIX)(virt_pc);
> + /* Avoid softmmu access on next load */
> + /* XXX: dont: phys PC is not correct anymore
> + * We could call get_phys_addr_code(env, pc); and remove the else
> + * condition, here.
> + */
> + //*start_pc = phys_pc;
The commented out code is completely bogus, please remove it. The comment is
also somewhat misleading/incorrect. The else would still be required for
accesses that span a page boundary.
The code itself looks ok, though I'd be surprised if it made a significant
difference. We're always going to hit the fast-path TLB lookup case anyway.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-15 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-14 11:44 [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation J. Mayer
2007-10-15 2:30 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2007-10-15 12:09 ` J. Mayer
2007-10-15 16:01 ` Paul Brook
2007-10-15 16:19 ` Fabrice Bellard
2007-10-15 21:30 ` J. Mayer
2007-10-15 22:42 ` Paul Brook
2007-10-16 20:27 ` J. Mayer
2007-10-16 22:00 ` Paul Brook
2007-10-16 23:38 ` J. Mayer
2007-10-17 0:43 ` Paul Brook
2007-10-16 22:26 ` Paul Brook
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-12 8:33 J. Mayer
2007-10-12 15:21 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-12 18:24 ` Jocelyn Mayer
2007-10-12 18:36 ` Fabrice Bellard
2007-10-12 18:39 ` Fabrice Bellard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200710150330.55998.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=l_indien@magic.fr \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.