All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2 statfs improvement for block and inode free count
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:00:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071016150033.677efd09.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1184377014.15968.14.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>

On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:36:54 -0700
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> 
> More statfs() improvements for ext2. ext2 already maintains
> percpu counters for free blocks and inodes. Derive free
> block count and inode count by summing up percpu counters,
> instead of counting up all the groups in the filesystem
> each time.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
> 
>  fs/ext2/super.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.22/fs/ext2/super.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.22.orig/fs/ext2/super.c	2007-07-13 20:06:38.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.22/fs/ext2/super.c	2007-07-13 20:06:51.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1136,12 +1136,12 @@ static int ext2_statfs (struct dentry * 
>  	buf->f_type = EXT2_SUPER_MAGIC;
>  	buf->f_bsize = sb->s_blocksize;
>  	buf->f_blocks = le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count) - overhead;
> -	buf->f_bfree = ext2_count_free_blocks(sb);
> + 	buf->f_bfree = percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
>  	buf->f_bavail = buf->f_bfree - le32_to_cpu(es->s_r_blocks_count);
>  	if (buf->f_bfree < le32_to_cpu(es->s_r_blocks_count))
>  		buf->f_bavail = 0;
>  	buf->f_files = le32_to_cpu(es->s_inodes_count);
> -	buf->f_ffree = ext2_count_free_inodes(sb);
> + 	buf->f_ffree = percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter);
>  	buf->f_namelen = EXT2_NAME_LEN;
>  	fsid = le64_to_cpup((void *)es->s_uuid) ^
>  	       le64_to_cpup((void *)es->s_uuid + sizeof(u64));
> 

Guys, I have this patch in a stalled state pending some convincing
demonstration/argument that it's actually a worthwhile change.

How much hurt will it cause on large-numa, and how much benefit do we get
for that hurt? 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-16 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-14  1:36 [PATCH] ext2 statfs improvement for block and inode free count Badari Pulavarty
2007-07-19  3:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-19 15:18   ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-07-20  9:01     ` Andreas Dilger
2007-10-16 22:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-10-16 22:18   ` Badari
2007-10-17 23:15   ` Andreas Dilger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071016150033.677efd09.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.