From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Luke Lu <git@vicaya.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: speed up project listing by limiting find depth
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:41:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071017004125.GI13801@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1192580691-14308-1-git-send-email-git@vicaya.com>
Luke Lu <git@vicaya.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 8db4dbe..b70ba8c 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ GITWEB_CONFIG = gitweb_config.perl
> GITWEB_HOME_LINK_STR = projects
> GITWEB_SITENAME =
> GITWEB_PROJECTROOT = /pub/git
> +GITWEB_PROJECT_MAXDEPTH = 2
I'd rather see this default to an unlimited (or maybe insane?) depth.
Current users may be surprised upon upgrading to a more recent git
when their gitweb stops showing projects because the default depth
is too small.
repo.or.cz is up at 3 deep, maybe 4 right now, right Pasky?
I think letting admins control the depth is a good idea, but its
a performance tuning thing and probably shouldn't break existing
setups.
> + # don't traverse too deep (Find is super slow on os x)
> + return if tr!/!! - $pfxdepth > $project_maxdepth && ($File::Find::prune = 1);
I don't do much gitweb hacking, but I usually don't like to find
code that mutates a value as an important side-effect in the middle
of a boolean condition that is used to determine if we are breaking
out of this function now, or falling through to do more work. yea
its more lines of code but I think it would be easier to grok if this
was a proper if {...}.
--
Shawn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-17 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-17 0:24 [PATCH] gitweb: speed up project listing by limiting find depth Luke Lu
2007-10-17 0:41 ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-17 1:03 Luke Lu
2007-10-17 1:13 Luke Lu
2007-10-17 1:35 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-17 2:40 ` Shawn O. Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071017004125.GI13801@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=git@vicaya.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.