All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change 'Deltifying objects' to 'Delta compressing objects'
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:21:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071019022154.GY14735@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071019021255.GD3290@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 08:45:27PM -0400, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> 
> > Recently I was referred to the Grammar Police as the git-pack-objects
> > progress message 'Deltifying %u objects' is considered to be not
> > proper English to at least some small but vocal segment of the
> > English speaking population.  Techncially we are applying delta
> > compression to these objects at this stage, so the new term is
> > slightly more acceptable to the Grammar Police but is also just
> > as correct.
> 
> Boo. I _like_ "deltifying". Sure, it's probably not in the dictionary,
> but that's how languages change: saying "delta compressing" all the time
> will get awkward, so people invent a new word using existing rules to
> explain a common phenomenon.

My eyes have gotten used to "Deltifying" but I have to admit that
in my early Git days I thought it looked damn odd.  Today I'm far
too familiar with Git to really notice this as a problem now.

I really don't have an opinion either way.  Actually I think the
entire progress system of git-pack-objects should be reduced even
further so that users aren't exposed to the internal phases we
are going through.  Most of them just don't care.  They just
want to know when its going to be done[*1*].

> Anyway, if you want to please the Grammar Police, should it not be
> "Delta-compressing"?  "Delta" is not an adverb here, but rather the
> phrase acts as a compound verb (i.e., the two words work in place of a
> single verb). Although "Delta-compressing objects" just looks stupid.

Yea, that is just stupid.  And is why I didn't use a - in my patch.


*1*: Yes, yes, I know that's hard to predict and impossible in
the really important cases (like network transfer of not yet
compressed data).  So just telling them that we are working and
have recently done something useful towards finishing our goal is
more than enough.  Its like putting mirrors on the wall in a lobby;
folks won't notice how long it takes for the elevator to arrive as
they are too busy preening themselves.

-- 
Shawn.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-19  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-19  0:45 [PATCH] Change 'Deltifying objects' to 'Delta compressing objects' Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19  2:12 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19  2:19   ` Sam Vilain
2007-10-19  2:24     ` David Symonds
2007-10-19  2:34       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19  3:02         ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19  2:36       ` Jeff King
2007-10-19  2:55         ` Sam Vilain
2007-10-19  2:25     ` Jeff King
2007-10-19  2:21   ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
2007-10-19  2:34     ` Jeff King
2007-10-19  2:47       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19  3:01       ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19  3:07         ` Jeff King
2007-10-19  3:24           ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19  3:32             ` Jeff King
2007-10-19  3:50               ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19  3:56                 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19  4:21                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-19  4:29                     ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 11:58                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19 19:00                         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-19 21:57                           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-19  5:09                 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19  3:33             ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19  5:03         ` [PATCH] Stop displaying "Pack pack-$ID created." during git-gc Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19  2:49     ` [PATCH] Change 'Deltifying objects' to 'Delta compressing objects' Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19  3:17       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19  3:38         ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19  3:41           ` Jeff King
2007-10-19  3:45           ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19  4:02             ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19 11:44             ` Wincent Colaiuta
2007-10-19  2:45   ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19  2:59     ` Jeff King
2007-10-19  3:11       ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-19  3:15         ` Jeff King
2007-10-19  3:27           ` Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071019022154.GY14735@spearce.org \
    --to=spearce@spearce.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nico@cam.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.