From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: "Maciej W\. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:01:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071019080116.GA2578@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071019075014.GA1765@ff.dom.local>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> sched_work_sync() with rtnl_lock(). It's only less probable to lockup
> with this than with flush_schedule_work().
...But, not much less...
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-19 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-19 14:38 [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-20 23:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-21 12:51 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-21 18:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-15 12:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-15 17:03 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-10-16 6:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-16 17:19 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-10-17 8:58 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-17 9:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 9:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-18 6:31 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-18 7:05 ` [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work " Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-18 15:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-10-18 15:58 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-10-19 7:50 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-19 8:01 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-10-22 6:11 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-22 18:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-10-23 6:59 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-23 9:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-19 8:00 ` Johannes Berg
2007-10-18 11:37 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-10-18 11:30 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-10-18 14:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-18 15:31 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-10-19 8:17 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-19 12:57 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-10-19 11:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-10-19 14:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-10-19 17:58 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-10-19 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071019080116.GA2578@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=afleming@freescale.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.