From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:48:36 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] lm-sensors: update info for SMSC LPC47B357 Message-Id: <20071019234836.005bf71e@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <191fb4ca0710181457h15f781a9o72f767e7f0734168@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <191fb4ca0710181457h15f781a9o72f767e7f0734168@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:16:51 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > On 10/19/07, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:57:55 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > > > Update the info for the SMSC LPC47B357 in sensors-detect. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Juerg Haefliger > > > > > Index: lm-sensors/prog/detect/sensors-detect > > > =================================> > > --- lm-sensors.orig/prog/detect/sensors-detect 2007-10-18 14:54:16.417255000 -0700 > > > +++ lm-sensors/prog/detect/sensors-detect 2007-10-18 14:55:16.105166000 -0700 > > > @@ -1752,8 +1752,8 @@ > > > devid => 0x56, > > > }, > > > { > > > - name => "SMSC LPC47B357 Super IO", > > > - # no datasheet > > > + name => "SMSC LPC47B357/M967 Super IO", > > > + driver => "not-a-sensor", > > > devid => 0x5d, > > > }, > > > { > > > > Are you sure of yourself? I've found this article: > > http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/roundupmobo/fs-d1627-a-i865pe.html > > > > "System monitoring is supported by the SMSC LPC47M967-NC chip (this > > chip (Hardware Monitor + Super I/O) is rarely used, we happened to see > > it only on Intel and FIC models). It controls: > > > > * processor, AGP bus voltages, +3.3, +5 and +12 V; > > * rotation speed of 2 ordinary fans and one in the power supply > > unit (it requires a special cable connected to the board); > > * temperatures of the processor (built-in sensor), the board > > (built-in sensor) and an external temperature sensor (supplied)." > > > > Could it be that LPC47M967 = LPC47B357 + hardware monitoring? > > I received the datasheets for both chips. Both of them advertise > themselves as 0x5d and neither has any HW monitoring capabilities. > Sorry, should have mentioned that in the patch email. OK, so the article was crap. Thanks for the clarification, I've applied your patch now. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors