From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjrCh-0002VY-3t for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:55:59 -0700 Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.204.231]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1IjrCg-0005g0-Qy for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:55:59 -0700 Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c8so995681qbc for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:52:02 +0800 From: WANG Cong Message-ID: <20071022065202.GI2998@hacking> References: <200710200252.37919.p.giarrusso@gmail.com> <87y7dyhv2u.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <20071021114854.GF2455@hacking> <20071021130848.GA4621@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <20071021132031.GI2455@hacking> <20071021154346.GW8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20071022043746.GF2998@hacking> <20071022052214.GY8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20071022061245.GG2998@hacking> <87d4v7fy5i.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d4v7fy5i.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final. Reply-To: WANG Cong List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Nix Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Dike , Paolo Giarrusso , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Landley , Al Viro , WANG Cong On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:42:33AM +0100, Nix wrote: >On 22 Oct 2007, WANG Cong uttered the following: >> I build UML for non-SMP x86. But I don't know about UML_NET_VDE. ;( >> >> Errors threw out by gcc (too many) are put here: >> http://wangcong.org/down/errors.txt > >It's hard to tell without LOCALE=C, but those are the sorts of results >I'd expect if you had run make {old,menu,x}config without specifying >ARCH=um, so you've configured for one architecture and are now trying >to build another. > >Where is the include/asm symlink pointing to in your build tree? $ ls -l include/asm lrwxrwxrwx 1 wangcong wangcong 6 2007-10-22 12:34 include/asm -> asm-um OK. Let me do the following: $ make mrproper ... $ make defconfig ARCH=um ... # # configuration written to .config # $ make ARCH=um (Still tons of errors here...) Am I wrong or I missed something? Regards. -- May the Source Be With You. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754801AbXJVG4S (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:56:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751464AbXJVG4D (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:56:03 -0400 Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com ([72.14.246.242]:43259 "EHLO ag-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754506AbXJVG4A (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:56:00 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=k7txXGiKUS0QKSA+3RTT5LwgBudRvGahd5LaEVfB07pspN0ZL2Ycb3PfLt4v138KOkX2HIuqLRngXo3UsjBUcZiPzZeHTCNJpAqIF1jumRh+6JX0M2TsZniJsDS4D1a3tIftvaWSs8Pg15TXTV2OS/VH5+Fe8NpWB9MnjJDKdCs= Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:52:02 +0800 From: WANG Cong To: Nix Cc: WANG Cong , Al Viro , Jeff Dike , Paolo Giarrusso , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Landley Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final. Message-ID: <20071022065202.GI2998@hacking> Reply-To: WANG Cong References: <200710200252.37919.p.giarrusso@gmail.com> <87y7dyhv2u.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <20071021114854.GF2455@hacking> <20071021130848.GA4621@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <20071021132031.GI2455@hacking> <20071021154346.GW8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20071022043746.GF2998@hacking> <20071022052214.GY8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20071022061245.GG2998@hacking> <87d4v7fy5i.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d4v7fy5i.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:42:33AM +0100, Nix wrote: >On 22 Oct 2007, WANG Cong uttered the following: >> I build UML for non-SMP x86. But I don't know about UML_NET_VDE. ;( >> >> Errors threw out by gcc (too many) are put here: >> http://wangcong.org/down/errors.txt > >It's hard to tell without LOCALE=C, but those are the sorts of results >I'd expect if you had run make {old,menu,x}config without specifying >ARCH=um, so you've configured for one architecture and are now trying >to build another. > >Where is the include/asm symlink pointing to in your build tree? $ ls -l include/asm lrwxrwxrwx 1 wangcong wangcong 6 2007-10-22 12:34 include/asm -> asm-um OK. Let me do the following: $ make mrproper ... $ make defconfig ARCH=um ... # # configuration written to .config # $ make ARCH=um (Still tons of errors here...) Am I wrong or I missed something? Regards. -- May the Source Be With You.