From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjwfZ-0003G9-VZ for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:46:13 -0700 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1IjwfY-0006CX-Hl for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:46:09 -0700 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:45:51 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar Message-ID: <20071022124551.GA7438@elte.hu> References: <20071022043746.GF2998@hacking> <20071022052214.GY8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20071022061245.GG2998@hacking> <87d4v7fy5i.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <20071022065202.GI2998@hacking> <20071022065943.GC10864@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20071022074823.GJ2998@hacking> <20071022113600.GA8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20071022122504.GL2998@hacking> <20071022124322.GB8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071022124322.GB8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final. List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Al Viro Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Dike , Paolo Giarrusso , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nix , Rob Landley , WANG Cong , Sam Ravnborg * Al Viro wrote: > in kernel/sched.c > > FWIW, I would simply kill the damn fastcall thing - right now the only > user is uml/i386; everything else either has it #defined to nothing or > (as i386 does) passes -mregparm=3 while having fastcall expand to > __attribute__((regparm(3))) - i.e. has all functions fastcall. > > Do we really need it on uml/i386 enough to keep bothering with that > mess? we should kill it there too. the only place where we should _please_ keep those annotations are for functions that get called from assembly code. This makes life immensely easier for -pg (CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACING) kernels. Ingo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755113AbXJVMqW (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:46:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752575AbXJVMqP (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:46:15 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:39568 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751706AbXJVMqO (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:46:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:45:51 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Al Viro Cc: WANG Cong , Sam Ravnborg , Nix , Jeff Dike , Paolo Giarrusso , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Landley Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final. Message-ID: <20071022124551.GA7438@elte.hu> References: <20071022043746.GF2998@hacking> <20071022052214.GY8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20071022061245.GG2998@hacking> <87d4v7fy5i.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <20071022065202.GI2998@hacking> <20071022065943.GC10864@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20071022074823.GJ2998@hacking> <20071022113600.GA8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20071022122504.GL2998@hacking> <20071022124322.GB8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071022124322.GB8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Al Viro wrote: > in kernel/sched.c > > FWIW, I would simply kill the damn fastcall thing - right now the only > user is uml/i386; everything else either has it #defined to nothing or > (as i386 does) passes -mregparm=3 while having fastcall expand to > __attribute__((regparm(3))) - i.e. has all functions fastcall. > > Do we really need it on uml/i386 enough to keep bothering with that > mess? we should kill it there too. the only place where we should _please_ keep those annotations are for functions that get called from assembly code. This makes life immensely easier for -pg (CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACING) kernels. Ingo