From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] aic7xxx: Enable 16-bit CDBs Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:35:51 -0600 Message-ID: <20071022193551.GF27248@parisc-linux.org> References: <20071019083239.D88FE18C61E@pentland.suse.de> <1192983563.3339.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <471CF5B9.2090800@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:34762 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753238AbXJVTfx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:35:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <471CF5B9.2090800@panasas.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: James Bottomley , Hannes Reinecke , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:10:49PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > I'm about to finish an RFC patchset for the extended commands. > I have implemented a more aggressive approach than the one > I've been sending for the last year. > (Matthew I have an extra 8-bytes save to scsi_cmnd on > 64bit and 12 bytes for 32bit. Guess how? ;)) Well ... the command has to be stored somewhere. If it's an additional kmalloc, that's a loss. If it's in the request, that's a loss too ... let's see where you're keeping it ;-) -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."