From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [Bug 8581] acpi-cpufreq gets very confused on suspend to ram Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:49:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20071022204924.GB7793@redhat.com> References: <20071022002423.3FC91108014@picon.linux-foundation.org> <87640zr3ka.fsf@denkblock.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87640zr3ka.fsf@denkblock.local> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: Elias Oltmanns Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:50:13AM +0200, Elias Oltmanns wrote: > > there's some whitespace damage in this patch (spaces instead of tabs). > > Asides from that though, it looks like the right thing to do. > > Can you fix that up, and bounce a copy to cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk please? > > Well, since this patch was mainly a copy-and-paste job from > cpufreq_userspace.c, the whitespace damages have been inherited once. In > fact, I have stumbled upon some more whitespace issues in in the cpufreq > subsystem and there are also some problems with lacking whitespace > causing misprinted debugging messages. If you're interested, I can come > up with a patch fixing all those problems I've accidentally come across. Yeah, it does seem to be a bit of a disaster. I've just removed some of the more obvious whitespace damage in cpufreq.git. If you spot any others after that, patches gratefully accepted. > Here is the patch fixing cpufreq_conservative.c anyway. It applies to > 2.6.23. Applied, thanks Elias. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk