From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 00/10] rdma: SVCRDMA Transport Driver Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:05:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20071023180531.GF30496@fieldses.org> References: <20071019215304.31937.28876.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> <20071022220219.GW583@fieldses.org> <471D5FFD.8090601@opengridcomputing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: neilb@suse.de, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, gnb@sgi.com To: Tom Tucker Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkO88-0005FX-SQ for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:05:28 -0700 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214] helo=fieldses.org) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1IkO8E-0005RJ-3Q for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:05:34 -0700 In-Reply-To: <471D5FFD.8090601@opengridcomputing.com> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:44:13PM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote: > J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 04:53:04PM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote: >> >>> This patchset implements the RDMA Transport Driver for the server >>> transport switch. This patchset has been tested with iozone >>> and Connectathon over NFSv3. >> >> Do you want these applied? >> >> > Yes. I'm assuming that this would include all incremental patches prior to > the RDMA transport driver as well? Yes; you can check my server-xprt-switch branch to see if I got it all. >>> This patchset along with all of the previous server side >>> transport switches are also available in this git tree: >>> >>> git://linux-nfs.org/~tomtucker/nfs-rdma-dev-2.6.git >>> >> >> This is missing a couple changes I made in my version: the two I notice >> are that I merged both "svc: Don't copy xprt_class data into svc_xprt >> instance" and "svc: Rename xpo_release to xpo_release_rqst" in with the >> previous patches. >> >> > Yes, please. Should I post my subsequent patches relative to your git tree? > That might make life easier. Sure; thanks. >> So I've ignored that for now and just applied these new patches on top >> of mine. I also rebased onto the latest linus git. >> > I should compare your tot to mine to make sure we're not out of sync. I'll > do that tomorrow. > > FYI, I'm working on a "perfect hindsight" branch as well. I'll let you know > when I've got that done. Oh, OK, fantastic. I'll stop monkeying with my copy if that's the case. (Though only exception being that if I may need to rebase every now and then.) --b. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs