From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] Get core affinity from acpi_processor_preregister_performance() Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:21:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20071023212155.GK15801@redhat.com> References: <200710231535.24805.mark.langsdorf@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200710231535.24805.mark.langsdorf@amd.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: Mark Langsdorf Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 03:35:24PM -0500, Mark Langsdorf wrote: > This should apply on top of the architectural pstate patch I just > submitted. It has been tested on several laptops and a few servers, > with 2nd and 3rd generation Opteron parts and some Turion X2s. > > > #define PFX "powernow-k8: " > #define BFX PFX "BIOS error: " > -#define VERSION "version 2.00.00" > +#define VERSION "version 2.20.00" > #include "powernow-k8.h" This looks like it includes your previous patch, rather than being on top of it. Care to rediff ? thanks, Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk