All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Volker Sauer <volker@volker-sauer.de>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Problem with new --physdev-out style
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:18:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024071854.GA18581@volker-sauer.de> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2931 bytes --]

Hi,

with recent kernels, I have this problem:

kernel: physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and
POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore.

What does "non-bridged" in this context mean?? If it means rules (or
traffic) that goes over the INPUT our OUTPUT chain, I do not understand,
why my rule set causes this message to appers a thousand times.

Here's all my rules with --physdev-out:

arthur: ~ # grep physdev-out /etc/init.d/firewall
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_INT -i $IF_EXT -d $localnet -s $Any -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_INT --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -s $ZAPHOD -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_INT --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -s $localnet -p tcp -d $MARVIN --dport 3389 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_DMZ --physdev-out $IF_INT -d $ZAPHOD -p tcp --dport 135:139 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_DMZ --physdev-out $IF_INT -d $ZAPHOD -p udp --dport 135:139 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_DMZ --physdev-out $IF_INT -d $ZAPHOD -p tcp --dport 445 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_DMZ --physdev-out $IF_INT -d $ZAPHOD -p udp --dport 445 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-in $IF_INT --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -s $ZAPHOD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_INT -i $BR_GUEST -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_GUEST -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -p tcp --dport 3389 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_GUEST -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_INT -p tcp --dport ssh -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $BR_GUEST -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_INT -p tcp --dport 30022 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $IF_EXT -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -p tcp --sport 22 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $IF_EXT -o $BR_INT -m physdev --physdev-out $IF_DMZ -s $i -p udp --sport 53 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT


Where: 

BR_INT="br-intern"
BR_GUEST="br-guest"
IF_EXT="eth0"
IF_INT="eth1"
IF_DMZ="vlan3"

You see, I use --physdev-out only in the FORWARD with bridged traffic, 
because the Interfaces given with -i or -i in these rules are always 
bridges (br-intern or br-guest).

Why do I get thousands of these error messages?

-- 
  Volker Sauer  *  Poststrasse 1/601   *   64293 Darmstadt  *   Germany
  E-Mail/Jabber: volker(at)volker-sauer.de * http://www.volker-sauer.de
  PGPKey-Fingerprint: DB26 11C7 B12E 0B27 3999 2E4F 7E35 4E4D 5DD5 D0E0
  http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7E354E4D5DD5D0E0 

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2007-10-24  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-24  7:18 Volker Sauer [this message]
2007-10-24  7:38 ` Problem with new --physdev-out style Patrick McHardy
2007-10-24  8:22   ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24  8:34     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-24  8:43       ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-10-24  9:15         ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24  9:22           ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-10-24  9:39             ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24  9:46               ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-10-24  9:05       ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24  9:42         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-24 12:06           ` Volker Sauer
2007-10-24 12:49             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-24 12:57               ` Volker Sauer
2007-10-24 14:11             ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-10-24 15:18               ` Volker Sauer
2007-10-24  9:28     ` Philip Craig
2007-10-24  8:36 ` Pascal Hambourg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071024071854.GA18581@volker-sauer.de \
    --to=volker@volker-sauer.de \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.