From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name identifier conventions
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:35:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710241435.42810@strip-the-willow> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071022163144.GA15773@ghostprotocols.net>
Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
| > I think that dccpprobe.c is the wrong name ... it should really be called ccid3_probe.c ...
| > I have been working on printing entries for CCID2, since in ccid2.c there is no probe support,
| > and instead ccid2_pr_debug is used for the same purpose all over the place.
|
| Indeed, lemme try converting it right now...
|
This is how far I came (only for info, applies only on test tree):
--- a/net/dccp/probe.c
+++ b/net/dccp/probe.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
XXX enough for this week, remove to re-enable
#include "dccp.h"
#include "ccid.h"
+#include "ccids/ccid2.h"
#include "ccids/ccid3.h"
static int port;
@@ -80,22 +81,37 @@ static int jdccp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *i
struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
{
const struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
- struct ccid3_hc_tx_sock *hctx = NULL;
+ struct ccid2_hc_tx_sock *tx2 = NULL;
+ struct ccid3_hc_tx_sock *tx3 = NULL;
- if (ccid_get_current_id(dccp_sk(sk), false) = DCCPC_CCID3)
- hctx = ccid3_hc_tx_sk(sk);
+ switch (ccid_get_current_id(dccp_sk(sk), false)) {
+ case DCCPC_CCID2:
+ tx2 = ccid2_hc_tx_sk(sk);
+ break;
+ case DCCPC_CCID3:
+ tx3 = ccid3_hc_tx_sk(sk);
+ }
if (port = 0 || ntohs(inet->dport) = port ||
ntohs(inet->sport) = port) {
- if (hctx)
+ if (tx3)
printl("%d.%d.%d.%d:%u %d.%d.%d.%d:%u %d %d %d %d %u "
"%llu %llu %d\n",
NIPQUAD(inet->saddr), ntohs(inet->sport),
NIPQUAD(inet->daddr), ntohs(inet->dport), size,
- hctx->ccid3hctx_s, hctx->ccid3hctx_rtt,
- hctx->ccid3hctx_p, hctx->ccid3hctx_x_calc,
- hctx->ccid3hctx_x_recv >> 6,
- hctx->ccid3hctx_x >> 6, hctx->ccid3hctx_t_ipi);
+ tx3->ccid3hctx_s, tx3->ccid3hctx_rtt,
+ tx3->ccid3hctx_p, tx3->ccid3hctx_x_calc,
+ tx3->ccid3hctx_x_recv >> 6,
+ tx3->ccid3hctx_x >> 6, tx3->ccid3hctx_t_ipi);
+ else if (tx2)
+ printl("%d.%d.%d.%d:%u %d.%d.%d.%d:%u %d %d %d %u %u %u\n",
+ NIPQUAD(inet->saddr), ntohs(inet->sport),
+ NIPQUAD(inet->daddr), ntohs(inet->dport), size,
+ tx2->ccid2hctx_srtt>>3,
+ tx2->ccid2hctx_rttvar>>2,
+ tx2->ccid2hctx_pipe,
+ tx2->ccid2hctx_cwnd,
+ tx2->ccid2hctx_ssthresh);
else
printl("%d.%d.%d.%d:%u %d.%d.%d.%d:%u %d\n",
NIPQUAD(inet->saddr), ntohs(inet->sport),
--- a/net/dccp/ccids/ccid2.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid2.c
@@ -129,9 +129,6 @@ static int ccid2_hc_tx_send_packet(struc
{
struct ccid2_hc_tx_sock *hctx = ccid2_hc_tx_sk(sk);
- ccid2_pr_debug("pipe=%d cwnd=%d\n", hctx->ccid2hctx_pipe,
- hctx->ccid2hctx_cwnd);
-
if (hctx->ccid2hctx_pipe < hctx->ccid2hctx_cwnd)
return 0;
@@ -259,9 +256,6 @@ static void ccid2_hc_tx_packet_sent(stru
}
hctx->ccid2hctx_seqh = next;
- ccid2_pr_debug("cwnd=%d pipe=%d\n", hctx->ccid2hctx_cwnd,
- hctx->ccid2hctx_pipe);
-
/*
* FIXME: The code below is broken and the variables have been removed
* from the socket struct. The `ackloss' variable was always set to 0,
@@ -316,7 +310,6 @@ static void ccid2_hc_tx_packet_sent(stru
ccid2_start_rto_timer(sk);
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_DCCP_CCID2_DEBUG
- ccid2_pr_debug("pipe=%d\n", hctx->ccid2hctx_pipe);
ccid2_pr_debug("Sent: seq=%llu\n", (unsigned long long)dp->dccps_gss);
do {
struct ccid2_seq *seqp = hctx->ccid2hctx_seqt;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-24 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-22 16:31 systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name identifier Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-10-24 12:11 ` systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name identifier conventions Gerrit Renker
2007-10-24 13:32 ` systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-10-24 13:35 ` Gerrit Renker [this message]
2007-10-24 15:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-10-25 14:03 ` systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name identifier conventions Gerrit Renker
2007-10-25 17:13 ` systemtap networking tapsets was: Re: [RFC]: field name Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200710241435.42810@strip-the-willow \
--to=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.