All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: yokota@netlab.is.tsukuba.ac.jp, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] nsp32_restart_autoscsi(): remove error check
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:54:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024165434.GZ30533@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193244072.3396.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:41:12PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:25 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The Coverity checker noted that we'll anyway Oops later when we ran into 
> > this condition - and the error check didn't prevent that.
> > 
> > Considering that the error condition shouldn't be possible, and we are 
> > not able to handle it easily, this patch simply removes the pointless 
> > error check.
> 
> This is the one where I said I don't like the fact that you're removing
> the explanatory message that's printed before we crash.  if you want to
> shut coverity up and stop sending the patch, I'm happy adding a BUG();
> after the nsp32_msg().

Sorry, I missed your answer when resending since it was in a different 
thread.

I'm still not convinced we really need the nsp32_msg() here but you are 
the maintainer and it's not a big deal anyway

A BUG() would IMHO be similarly pointless as the nsp32_msg() at this 
point and there's no value in changing code only for the sake of the 
Coverity checker.

> James

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-24 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-24 16:25 [RFC: 2.6 patch] nsp32_restart_autoscsi(): remove error check Adrian Bunk
2007-10-24 16:41 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-24 16:54   ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-23 19:33 Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071024165434.GZ30533@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yokota@netlab.is.tsukuba.ac.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.