From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:41:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024224130.GA30819@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071024223250.GI19691@waste.org>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:32:50PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Not completely implausible, but a) why isn't this seen on basically
> every machine with software TLB? b) why does -local- GDB, which is
> presumably doing much less work than gdbserver + network stack, not fail?
You said it yourself. Local gdb does more work -> blows through more
TLB entries.
I can't answer you about the other half, but I'm pretty sure TLB
invalidation is already supposed to be happening... somewhere.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-24 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-24 19:46 Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405 Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 20:28 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 20:42 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 20:46 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 21:54 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 22:27 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 22:32 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 22:39 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 22:40 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-26 1:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-24 22:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2007-10-26 1:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 20:41 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-27 1:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-27 1:27 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-24 20:34 ` David Daney
2007-10-26 1:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 1:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 2:45 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-26 3:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 14:41 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-27 1:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-27 7:32 ` [PATCH/RFC] powerpc: Pass PID argument to _tlbie (WAS: Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405) Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-29 12:08 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-29 20:15 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-29 20:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-29 21:13 ` Matt Mackall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071024224130.GA30819@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.