From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: FUJITA Tomonori Subject: RE: [PATCH -mm 11/11] aacraid: use pci_set_dma_max_seg_size Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:21:31 +0900 Message-ID: <20071025012348Z.tomof@acm.org> References: <67bb10d9f4e9473ddc84d9839114602c1966f19f.tomof@acm.org> <20071024173019I.tomof@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mo10.iij4u.or.jp ([210.138.174.78]:60388 "EHLO mo10.iij4u.or.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753295AbXJXQWi (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:22:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com Cc: tomof@acm.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, aacraid@adaptec.com, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:34:23 -0400 "Salyzyn, Mark" wrote: > ACK Thanks. > Based on the presence of the call. 2.6.22, for instance, does not have > this capability... > > I did not test this change, just accepting on the principals. How much > testing of the change did you do Fujita? Unfortunately, I tested only the main component (device and pci changes) with ppc64 IOMMU. I don't have the other IOMMUs. I didn't test the aacraid patch but I guess that I have aacraid in the workplace so I can test the patch (without the IOMMU chages).